Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31965382›Full record

ArticleRice (New York, N.Y.)2020

Comparison of CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a Ribonucleoprotein Complexes for Genome Editing Efficiency in the Rice Phytoene Desaturase (OsPDS) Gene.

Raviraj Banakar, Mollie Schubert, Michael Collingwood, Christopher Vakulskas, Alan L Eggenberger, Kan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rice (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Tiny but powerful: protoplast isolation inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  9. Pigments to precision: RUBY aiding genetic transformation and genome editing in wheat and barley.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Efficient CRISPR/Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of CRISPR-MAD7 and CRISPR-Cas9 for Gene Disruptions inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raviraj BanakarDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Mollie SchubertIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA.
Michael CollingwoodIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA.
Christopher VakulskasIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA.
Alan L EggenbergerDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Kan WangDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. kanwang@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2474-5800
Integrated DNA Technologies (United States) · USIowa State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Division of Integrative Organismal Systems IOS 1725122National Institute of Food and Agriculture # 2016-06247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelivery of CRISPR reagents into cells as ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes enables transient editing, and avoids CRISPR reagent integration in the genomes. Another technical advantage is that RNP delivery can bypass the need of cloning and vector construction steps. In this work we compared efficacies and types of edits for three Cas9 (WT Cas9 nuclease, HiFi Cas9 nuclease, Cas9 D10A nickase) and two Cas12a nucleases (AsCas12a and LbCas12a), using the rice phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene as a target site.

findingsDelivery of two Cas9 nucleases (WT Cas9, and HiFi Cas9) and one Cas12a nuclease (LbCas12a) resulted in targeted mutagenesis of the PDS gene. LbCas12a had a higher editing efficiency than that of WT Cas9 and HiFi Cas9. Editing by Cas9 enzymes resulted in indels (1-2 bp) or larger deletions between 20-bp to 30-bp, which included the loss of the PAM site; whereas LbCas12a editing resulted in deletions ranging between 2 bp to 20 bp without the loss of the PAM site.

conclusionsIn this work, when a single target site of the rice gene OsPDS was evaluated, the LbCas12a RNP complex achieved a higher targeted mutagenesis frequency than the AsCas12a or Cas9 RNPs.

Indexed as

Cas12aCas9CRISPRRibonucleoproteinsRiceSynthetic guide RNAs

Identifiers

PMID31965382
PMCPMC6973557
OpenAlexW3011719482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.