ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020
Management of Angina Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06640400 (A Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Cardiovascular Ultrasound Therapy on the Rehabilitation of Patients After PCI for Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Cardiovascular Ultrasound Therapy on the Rehabilitation of Patients After PCI for Coronary Artery Disease
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Influences of Chronic Kidney Disease on Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusions.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The effectiveness of a motivational text-messaging program for smoking cessation after coronary angioplasty: a quasi-experimental study.BMC research notes · 2023Trial
- Qu-shi-hua-tan decoction's efficacy and safety for patients with angina following coronary revascularization: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial study protocol.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- The Serial Mediation Effects of Social Support and Self-Efficacy on Health Literacy and Self-Management Behaviors Among Young and Middle-Aged Cardiac Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Coronary vasospasm: A narrative review.World journal of cardiology · 2021Review
- Risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewOur review discusses the management of post percutaneous coronary intervention angina (PPCIA) which negatively impacts 20-40% of patients and imposes a high burden on the healthcare system. RECENT
findingsMechanisms of PPCIA include microvascular dysfunction, distal coronary vasospasm or disease, microembolization, myocardial bridge, coronary artery disease (CAD) progression, and rarely stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis. Nitrates, beta blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers, and ranolazine are the common medical management options. Only BB showed 1-year mortality benefit following myocardial infarction. Stress echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance are the best to detect CAD vs. microvascular dysfunction. Invasively, vasoprovocative testing and fractional flow reserve provide useful prognostic information. If the ischemia burden is ≤10%, conservative management should be considered based upon the individual patient scenario. The optimal management of PPCIA remains unclear and further research is necessary. Multiple treatment options exist, which should be implemented in an individualized fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31965355What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.