Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31965336›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2020

Micro-computed tomography high resolution evaluation of dimensional and morphological changes of 3 root-end filling materials in simulated physiological conditions.

Fernanda Ferrrari Esteves Torres, Reinhilde Jacobs, Mostafa EzEldeen, Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Bernardo Camargo Dos Santos, Éverton Lucas-Oliveira, Tito José Bonagamba, Mario Tanomaru-Filho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chemical Stability and Bond Strength of Endodontic Sealers Exposed to Acidic, Alkaline and Protein-Rich Environments: An In Vitro Investigation.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fernanda Ferrrari Esteves TorresDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS IMPATH research group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mostafa EzEldeenOMFS IMPATH research group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Juliane Maria Guerreiro-TanomaruDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bernardo Camargo Dos SantosDepartment of Nuclear Energy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Éverton Lucas-OliveiraSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, PO Box 369, 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Tito José BonagambaSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, PO Box 369, 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Mario Tanomaru-FilhoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil. tanomaru@uol.com.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/19049-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate volumetric and morphological stability of 3 root-end filling materials in addition to porosity and interface voids, using micro-computed tomography (µCT) in high resolution and a highly accurate approach for image analysis. Following root-end resection and apical preparation, two-rooted maxillary premolars were divided into three groups, according to the filling materials: White MTA Angelus, Biodentine, and IRM. Samples were scanned by µCT at 5 µm after the setting time and at time intervals of 7 and 30 days after immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Volumetric and morphological changes besides material porosity and interface voids were evaluated by comparing initial values and those obtained after immersion. Data were analyzed statistically, using ANOVA and t-tests (α = 0.05). All materials showed volumetric stability. Regarding the morphological changes, Biodentine had a significant thickness reduction after storage in PBS when compared with MTA. Biodentine also showed an increase in porosity, as well as in percentage and thickness of voids after 30 days of immersion. In conclusion, µCT in high resolution and an accurate image analysis approach may be used to evaluate morphological changes of endodontic materials. Although Biodentine showed suitable adaptability and lower values of porosity than MTA, after PBS immersion there was a dimensional reduction of this material, besides an increase in porosity and interface voids.

Indexed as

X-Ray MicrotomographyDental MaterialsDental Restoration, PermanentMaterials TestingTooth RootDental Materials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.