ArticleDer Nervenarzt2020
[Disorder-related case groups for needs-based hospital care].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe individual needs of patients are central to hospital care. Due to the resulting complexity grouping of patients with similar therapeutic needs seems to facilitate an efficient organization of processes and the required treatment resources in hospital care.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a system of disorder-related, treatment-oriented case groups as a possible tool for the efficient and needs-based organization of hospital care. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe disorder-related groups were developed in a multistage, mixed-methods design. The technical content and quantitative description of the case groups and the extent of treatment included all consecutive inpatient treatment cases discharged between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017 from 9 psychiatric hospitals in Hesse, Germany.
resultsAll diagnoses in chapter F of the German modification of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10-GM) were grouped into a total of 10 disorder-related groups. Analyses included 20,252 inpatient hospital treatment cases. Substantial management-relevant differences between the case groups could be identified and the various case group-specific configurations of clinically relevant comorbidities could be demonstrated. DISCUSSION: The presented disorder-related grouping system and configuration of comorbidities suggest a modular organization of therapeutic measures and constitute a promising basis for needs-based management of patient care. Future work will show to what degree the disorder-related groups can facilitate a needs-specific treatment and align economic and therapeutic interests of psychiatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31965201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.