Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31965112›Full record

ReviewPathologica2019

Practical approach to diagnosis of bland-looking spindle cell lesions of the breast.

G Magro, L Salvatorelli, L Puzzo, E Piombino, G Bartoloni, G Broggi, G M Vecchio

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Differential diagnosis of primary mesenchymal neoplasms of the breast.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G MagroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele", Anatomic Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Italy.
L SalvatorelliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele", Anatomic Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Italy.
L PuzzoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele", Anatomic Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Italy.
E PiombinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele", Anatomic Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Italy.
G BartoloniAnatomic Pathology, A.R.N.A.S. Garibaldi-Nesima, Catania, Italy.
G BroggiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele", Anatomic Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Italy.
G M VecchioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele", Anatomic Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Italy.
Ospedale Garibaldi · ITUniversity of Catania · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of bland-looking spindle cell lesions of the breast is often challenging because there is a close morphological and immunohistochemical overlap among the different entities. The present review will discuss reactive spindle cell nodule/exuberant scar, nodular fasciitis, inflammatory pseudotumor, myofibroblastoma (classic type), lipomatous myofibroblastoma, palisaded myofibroblastoma, benign fibroblastic spindle cell tumor, spindle cell lipoma, fibroma, leiomyoma, solitary fibrous tumor, myxoma, schwannoma/neurofibroma, desmoid-type fibromatosis, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, low-grade fibromatosis-like spindle cell carcinoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma arising in the breast parenchyma. The pathologist should be aware of each single lesion to achieve a correct diagnosis to ensure patient a correct prognostic information and therapy. Accordingly representative illustrations and morphological/immunohistochemical diagnostic clues will be provided.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaDermatofibrosarcomaDiagnosis, DifferentialFasciitisFemaleFibrosarcomaHumansNeoplasms, Muscle TissueSkin NeoplasmsBreast parenchymaDiagnostic approachDifferential diagnosisSpindle cell tumors

Identifiers

PMID31965112
PMCPMC8145669
OpenAlexW2998206983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.