Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31965017›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A screening-level assessment of the pollinator-attractiveness of ornamental nursery stock using a honey bee foraging assay.

Douglas B Sponsler, Christina M Grozinger, Rodney T Richardson, Andrea Nurse, Dalton Brough, Harland M Patch, Kimberly A Stoner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Where Does Honey Bee (Insects · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas B SponslerDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA, 16802, USA. dbs31@psu.edu.
Christina M GrozingerDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA, 16802, USA.
Rodney T RichardsonDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Andrea NurseClimate Change Institute, University of Maine, 206 Sawyer Research Center, Orono, Maine, 04469, USA.
Dalton BroughDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA, 16802, USA.
Harland M PatchDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA, 16802, USA.
Kimberly A StonerThe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-7082
Pennsylvania State University · USConnecticut Agricultural Experiment Station · USUniversity of Maine · USYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In urban and suburban landscapes characterized by extensive designed greenspaces, the support of pollinator communities hinges significantly on floral resources provided by ornamental plants. The attractiveness of ornamental plants to pollinators, however, cannot be presumed, and some studies suggest that a majority of ornamental plant varieties receive little or no pollinator visitation. Here, we harness the sampling power of the western honey bee, a generalist pollinator whose diet breadth overlaps substantially with that of other pollinators, to survey the utilization of ornamental plants grown at three commercial nurseries in Connecticut, USA. Using a combination of DNA metabarcoding and microscopy, we identify, to genus-level, pollen samples from honey bee colonies placed within each nursery, and we compare our results with nursery plant inventories to identify the subset of cultivated genera that were visited during pollen foraging. Samples were collected weekly from May to September, encompassing the majority of the growing season. Our findings show that some plant genera known to be cultivated as ornamentals in our system, particularly ornamental trees and shrubs (e.g. Hydrangea, Rosa, Spiraea, Syringa, Viburnum), functioned as major pollen sources, but the majority of plants inventoried at our nurseries provided little or no pollen to honey bees. These results are in agreement with a growing body of literature highlighting the special importance of woody plants as resources for flower-visiting insects. We encourage further exploration of the genera highlighted in our data as potential components of pollinator-friendly ornamental greenspace.

Indexed as

FlowersGardensPlantsPollenPollinationAnimalsBees

Identifiers

PMID31965017
PMCPMC6972849
OpenAlexW3001533592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.