Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964778›Full record

ArticleBMJ sexual & reproductive health2020

Changes in the prevalence and profile of users of contraception in Britain 2000-2010: evidence from two National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.

Rebecca S French, Lorna Gibson, Rebecca Geary, Anna Glasier, Kaye Wellings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca S FrenchFaculty of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK Rebecca.French@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-5022
Lorna GibsonFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rebecca GearyFaculty of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Anna GlasierFaculty of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kaye WellingsFaculty of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701757Wellcome Trust 084840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe prevalence and trends in contraceptive method use in Britain through a comparison of the second and third National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-2 and Natsal-3).

methodsCross-sectional probability sample surveys. General population sample of women aged 16-44 years, resident in Britain, with ever-experience of vaginal sex and, for analysis by sociodemographic characteristics, vaginal sex in the last year. Main outcome measure was current contraceptive method use ('usual these days'), categorised by effectiveness.

resultsPrevalence of current contraceptive use among women who had ever had vaginal sex declined between Natsal-2 and Natsal-3, 83.5% (95% CI 82.4 to 84.5) and 76.4% (95% CI 75.0 to 77.7), respectively. The condom and oral contraceptive pill remain the most commonly used methods. One in five women reported use of a most effective method. While no difference was found between surveys in use of most effective methods, a decline in sterilisation use was compensated by an increase in long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use. Increased LARC use was particularly evident among under-25s compared with women aged 40-44 years (OR 11.35, 95% CI 3.23 to 39.87) and a decline was observed among those with two or more children relative to those with none (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.35).

conclusionsStrategies to improve access to LARC methods have been particularly successful in increasing uptake among young people in the first decade of the 21st century. Whether this trajectory is maintained given changing sociodemographic characteristics and more recent financial cuts to sexual health service provision will warrant investigation.

Indexed as

PrevalenceAdolescentAdultAgedContraceptionContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomcontraceptive methodsprevalenceprobability sample surveytrends

Identifiers

PMID31964778
PMCPMC7392488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.