Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964728›Full record

ArticlemBio2020

Effects of Spatial Variability and Relic DNA Removal on the Detection of Temporal Dynamics in Soil Microbial Communities.

Paul Carini, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Eve-Lyn S Hinckley, Hannah Holland-Moritz, Tess E Brewer, Garrett Rue, Caihong Vanderburgh, Diane McKnight, Noah Fierer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hydrogen stable isotope probing of lipids demonstrates slow rates of microbial growth in soil.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. AMF Inoculum Enhances Crop Yields ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul CariniCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA paulcarini@email.arizona.edu noah.fierer@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9653-7309
Manuel Delgado-BaquerizoCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Eve-Lyn S HinckleyInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Hannah Holland-MoritzCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Tess E BrewerCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Garrett RueInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Caihong VanderburghCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Diane McKnightInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Noah FiererCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA paulcarini@email.arizona.edu noah.fierer@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-4261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have comprehensively investigated the temporal variability in soil microbial communities despite widespread recognition that the belowground environment is dynamic. In part, this stems from the challenges associated with the high degree of spatial heterogeneity in soil microbial communities and because the presence of relic DNA (DNA from dead cells or secreted extracellular DNA) may dampen temporal signals. Here, we disentangle the relationships among spatial, temporal, and relic DNA effects on prokaryotic and fungal communities in soils collected from contrasting hillslopes in Colorado, USA. We intensively sampled plots on each hillslope over 6 months to discriminate between temporal variability, intraplot spatial heterogeneity, and relic DNA effects on the soil prokaryotic and fungal communities. We show that the intraplot spatial variability in microbial community composition was strong and independent of relic DNA effects and that these spatial patterns persisted throughout the study. When controlling for intraplot spatial variability, we identified significant temporal variability in both plots over the 6-month study. These microbial communities were more dissimilar over time after relic DNA was removed, suggesting that relic DNA hinders the detection of important temporal dynamics in belowground microbial communities. We identified microbial taxa that exhibited shared temporal responses and show that these responses were often predictable from temporal changes in soil conditions. Our findings highlight approaches that can be used to better characterize temporal shifts in soil microbial communities, information that is critical for predicting the environmental preferences of individual soil microbial taxa and identifying linkages between soil microbial community composition and belowground processes.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyMicrobial InteractionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeasonsSoilSpatio-Temporal AnalysisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilCritical Zone Observatory Networkhillslope aspectmicrobial interactionsmicrobial seasonalitynitrogen cyclingsoil bacterial and fungal communitiessoil microbial ecology

Identifiers

PMID31964728
PMCPMC6974563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.