Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964677›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

International development and implementation of a core measurement set for research and audit studies in implant-based breast reconstruction: a study protocol.

Shelley Potter, Charlotte Davies, Christopher Holcombe, Eva Weiler-Mithoff, Joanna Skillman, Raghavan Vidya, Yazan Masannat, Walter Weber, Joerg Heil, Sherif Wilson and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Shelley PotterBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK shelley.potter@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-312X
Charlotte DaviesBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK.
Christopher HolcombeLinda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Eva Weiler-MithoffCanniesburn Department of Plastic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Joanna SkillmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Raghavan VidyaNew Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Yazan MasannatBreast Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
Walter WeberUniversity Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Joerg HeilUniversity Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sherif WilsonBristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Steven ThrushBreast Unit, Worcester Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK.
Lisa WhiskerNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Jane BlazebyBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK.
Chris MetcalfeBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK.
Kerry AveryBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5477-2418
Southmead Hospital · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBHeidelberg University · DENew Cross Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Basel · CHWorcestershire Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2016-16-019Department of Health PB-PG-0214-33065Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOutcome reporting in research studies of breast reconstruction is inconsistent and lacks standardisation. The results of individual studies therefore cannot be meaningfully compared or combined limiting their value. A core outcome set (COS) has been developed to address these issues and identified 11 key outcomes to be measured and reported in all future research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery (RBS). A COS represents what key outcomes should be measured. The next step is to determine how and when this should be done. The aim of this study is to develop a core measurement set (CMS) for use in research and audit studies in implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CMS will be developed in accordance with the guidance developed by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative (COMET) and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) group for the selection of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) for relevant outcome domains included in the RBS COS. This will involve three phases with strategies to promote implementation as a final additional phase. The phases are (1) conceptual considerations in which the target population, procedures and settings are defined; (2) systematic reviews to identify existing clinical, patient-reported and cosmetic OMIs and, if appropriate, assess their quality using COSMIN methodology; (3) a modified Delphi process including sequential Delphi surveys involving approximately 100 healthcare professionals and a face to face consensus meeting to agree and ratify which outcome definitions and OMIs should be used and standardised time points for assessment; (4) strategies to promote dissemination and adoption of the CMS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by University of Bristol Faculty Research Ethics Committee FREC ID 60221. Dissemination strategies will include scientific meeting presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications. Implementation activities will include engagement with journal editors and funders to promote uptake and use of the CMS.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsClinical AuditConsensusDelphi TechniqueEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansMammaplastyOutcome Assessment, Health Carebreast surgerybreast tumoursplastic & reconstructive surgery

Identifiers

PMID31964677
PMCPMC7045234
OpenAlexW3001455946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.