Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964671›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Are adverse events in newly trained home dialysis patients related to learning styles? A single-centre retrospective study from Toronto, Canada.

Bourne Lewis Auguste, Michael Girsberger, Claire Kennedy, Thatsaphan Srithongkul, Margaret McGrath-Chong, Joanne Bargman, Christopher T Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developing and Evaluating a Home Hemodialysis Training Program-A Quality Improvement Study.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bourne Lewis AugusteMedicine; Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada bourne.auguste@sunnybrook.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6741-2427
Michael GirsbergerMedicine; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Claire KennedyMedicine; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Thatsaphan SrithongkulMedicine; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Margaret McGrath-ChongMedicine; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joanne BargmanMedicine; Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher T ChanMedicine; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHome haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) have seen growth in utilisation around the globe over the last few years. However, home dialysis, with its attendant technical complexity and risk of adverse events continues to pose challenges for wider adoption. We examined whether differences in patients' learning styles are associated with differing risk of adverse events in both home HD and PD patients.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingTertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

participantsOne hundred and eighteen prevalent adult (≥18 years) home dialysis patients (40 PD and 78 home HD) were enrolled. Patients on home dialysis for less than 6 months or receiving home nursing assistance for dialysis were excluded from the study.

interventionsEnrolled patients completed (VARK) Visual, Aural, Reading-writing and Kinesthetic questionnaires to determine learning styles. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Home HD and PD adverse events were identified within 6 months of completing home dialysis training. Event rates were then stratified and compared according to learning styles.

resultsThirty patients had a total of 53 adverse events. We used logistic regression analysis to determine unadjusted and adjusted ORs for a single adverse event. Non-visual learners were 4.35 times more likely to have an adverse event (p=0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, dialysis modality, training duration, dialysis vintage, prior renal replacement therapy, visual impairment, education and literacy, an adverse event was still four times more likely among non-visual learners compared to visual learners (p=0.008). A subgroup analysis of home HD patients showed adverse events were more likely among non-visual learners (OR 11.1; p=0.003), whereas PD patients showed a trend for more adverse events in non-visual learners (OR: 1.60; p=0.694).

conclusionsDifferent learning styles in home dialysis patients exist. Visual learning styles are associated with fewer adverse events in home dialysis patients within the first 6 months of completing training. Individualisation of home dialysis training by learning style is warranted.

Indexed as

LearningPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedFemaleHemodialysis, HomeHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care Centersadverse eventsdialysisend-stage renal failurehome haemodialysislearning stylesperitoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID31964671
PMCPMC7045245
OpenAlexW3002485197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.