Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964564›Full record

Trial reportWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Sadia Haider, Cynthia Stoffel, Kristin Rankin, Keriann Uesugi, Arden Handler, Rachel Caskey

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Addressing Women's Health Care Needs During Pediatric Care.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Mapping Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Interventions to the Social Ecological Model: A Scoping Review.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadia HaiderThe University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: shaider2@bsd.uchicago.edu.
Cynthia StoffelThe University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Kristin RankinThe University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Keriann UesugiThe University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Arden HandlerThe University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Rachel CaskeyThe University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR029879 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MAZZONE, THEODORE · 2009 to 2011
$11.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial.

methodsWomen with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed.

resultsBetween January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-3.07).

conclusionsWomen perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.

Indexed as

Infant CarePostpartum PeriodPregnancy, UnplannedAdultBirth IntervalsChild, PreschoolContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionPregnancySterilization, ReproductiveTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31964564
PMCPMC8696743
OpenAlexW2998914766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.