Trial reportWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Expulsion rates 12 months after early versus interval postpartum intrauterine device placement: a randomized trial.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Successful strategies that address gender-related barriers and promote bodily autonomy within efforts to scale up and sustain postpregnancy contraception: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of Patient-Centered Perinatal Contraceptive Counseling.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- Understanding feasibility and acceptability of implementation of linking delivery of family planning and infant vaccination care in rural Maharashtra, India: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Optimizing Access to Preventive Reproductive Health Care: Meeting Patients Where They Are At.American journal of public health · 2021Article
- Addressing Women's Health Care Needs During Pediatric Care.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- "An Act of Complete Care": Provider Perspectives on Linking Maternal Contraceptive Care With Well-Baby Visits in Community Health Centers.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- Mapping Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Interventions to the Social Ecological Model: A Scoping Review.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
- Postpartum Family Planning in Pediatrics: A Survey of Parental Contraceptive Needs and Health Services Preferences.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial.
methodsWomen with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed.
resultsBetween January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-3.07).
conclusionsWomen perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.