Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964404›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2020

The scale affects our view on the identification and distribution of microbial communities in ticks.

Thomas Pollet, Hein Sprong, Emilie Lejal, Aleksandra I Krawczyk, Sara Moutailler, Jean-Francois Cosson, Muriel Vayssier-Taussat, Agustín Estrada-Peña

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metagenomic Profile of Bacterial Communities ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First Molecular Evidence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Evolutionary Convergence of Nutritional Symbionts in Ticks.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microbiome ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Temporal dynamics of theCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas PolletUMR BIPAR, Animal Health Laboratory, INRAE, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France. thomas.pollet@vet-alfort.fr.
Hein SprongCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Emilie LejalUMR BIPAR, Animal Health Laboratory, INRAE, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Aleksandra I KrawczykCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Sara MoutaillerUMR BIPAR, Animal Health Laboratory, INRAE, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Jean-Francois CossonUMR BIPAR, Animal Health Laboratory, INRAE, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Muriel Vayssier-TaussatINRAE, Animal Health Department, Nouzilly, France.
Agustín Estrada-PeñaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRBipar · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks transmit the highest variety of pathogens impacting human and animal health worldwide. It is now well established that ticks also harbour a microbial complex of coexisting symbionts, commensals and pathogens. With the development of high throughput sequencing technologies, studies dealing with such diverse bacterial composition in tick considerably increased in the past years and revealed an unexpected microbial diversity. These data on diversity and composition of the tick microbes are increasingly available, giving crucial details on microbial communities in ticks and improving our knowledge on the tick microbial community. However, consensus is currently lacking as to which scales (tick organs, individual specimens or species, communities of ticks, populations adapted to particular environmental conditions, spatial and temporal scales) best facilitate characterizing microbial community composition of ticks and understanding the diverse relationships among tick-borne bacteria. Temporal or spatial scales have a clear influence on how we conduct ecological studies, interpret results, and understand interactions between organisms that build the microbiome. We consider that patterns apparent at one scale can collapse into noise when viewed from other scales, indicating that processes shaping tick microbiome have a continuum of variability that has not yet been captured. Based on available reports, this review demonstrates how much the concept of scale is crucial to be considered in tick microbial community studies to improve our knowledge on tick microbe ecology and pathogen/microbiota interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsArachnid VectorsDisease ReservoirsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMicrobiotaSpatio-Temporal AnalysisSymbiosisTick-Borne DiseasesTicksScalesSpatialTemporalTick microbe interactionsTick microbiome

Identifiers

PMID31964404
PMCPMC6975024
OpenAlexW3010731143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.