Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964390›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2020

Legal and ethical framework for global health information and biospecimen exchange - an international perspective.

Lara Bernasconi, Selçuk Şen, Luca Angerame, Apolo P Balyegisawa, Damien Hong Yew Hui, Maximilian Hotter, Chung Y Hsu, Tatsuya Ito, Francisca Jörger, Wolfgang Krassnitzer and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lara BernasconiClinical Trials Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Selçuk ŞenCenter of Excellence for Clinical Research, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
Luca AngerameClinical Trial Center Spa, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Apolo P BalyegisawaInfectious Diseases Institute of Kampala, Kampala, Uganda.
Damien Hong Yew HuiSingapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Maximilian HotterMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Chung Y HsuClinical Trial Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tatsuya ItoInstitute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science, Kyoto University and Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Francisca JörgerClinical Trials Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Wolfgang KrassnitzerMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Adam T PhillipsBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, USA.
Rui LiShanghai Clinical Research Center, Shanghai, China.
Louise StockleyCambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridgem, UK.
Fabian TayClinical Trials Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Charlotte von Heijne WidlundKarolinska Trial Alliance, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ming WanShanghai Clinical Research Center, Shanghai, China.
Creany WongClinical Trials Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Henry YauClinical Trials Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Thomas F HiemstraCambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridgem, UK.
Yagiz UresinCenter of Excellence for Clinical Research, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gabriela SentiClinical Trials Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. CTC-ICN@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0103-1162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe progress of electronic health technologies and biobanks holds enormous promise for efficient research. Evidence shows that studies based on sharing and secondary use of data/samples have the potential to significantly advance medical knowledge. However, sharing of such resources for international collaboration is hampered by the lack of clarity about ethical and legal requirements for transfer of data and samples across international borders. MAIN TEXT: Here, the International Clinical Trial Center Network (ICN) reports the legal and ethical requirements governing data and sample exchange (DSE) across four continents. The most recurring requirement is ethical approval, whereas only in specific conditions approval of national health authorities is required. Informed consent is not required in all sharing situations. However, waiver of informed consent is only allowed in certain countries/regions and under certain circumstances. The current legal and ethical landscape appears to be very complex and under constant evolution. Regulations differ between countries/regions and are often incomplete, leading to uncertainty.

conclusionWith this work, ICN illuminates the unmet need for a single international collaborative framework to facilitate DSE. Harmonising requirements for global DSE will reduce inefficiency and waste in research. There are many challenges to realising this ambitious vision, including inconsistent terminology and definitions, and heterogeneous and dynamic legal constraints. Here, we identify areas of agreement and significant difference as a necessary first step towards facilitating international collaboration. We propose the establishment of a working group to continue the comparison across jurisdictions, create a standardised glossary and define a set of basic principles and fundamental requirements for DSE.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGlobal HealthHumansInformation DisseminationInternational CooperationInternationalityOwnershipTissue BanksBig dataBiobankingData sharingInternational exchangeResearch policies

Identifiers

PMID31964390
PMCPMC6975025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.