Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964361›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

User-provider experiences of the implementation of KidzAlive-driven child-friendly spaces in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Chipo Mutambo, Kemist Shumba, Khumbulani W Hlongwana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Family-centred care interventions for children with chronic conditions: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chipo MutamboThe Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, King George Avenue, Durban, 4041, South Africa. 213572020@stu.ukzn.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-9667
Kemist ShumbaThe Discipline of Psychology, School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Office IX06 TB Davies Ext, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4041, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-1413
Khumbulani W HlongwanaDepartment of Public Health Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, George Campbell Building, Room 217, 2nd Floor, King George V Avenue, Glenwood, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4041, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1777-0402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidzAlive is a child-centred intervention aimed at improving the quality of HIV care for children in South Africa. Through this intervention, 10 child-friendly spaces were created in 10 primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in KwaZulu-Natal to enhance child-centred HIV care. However, the user-provider experiences of these child-friendly spaces in these facilities have not been explored. This paper addresses this gap.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with children (n = 30), their primary caregivers (PCGs) (n = 30), and KidzAlive trained healthcare workers (HCWs) (n = 20) using and providing child-friendly spaces, respectively. Data were generated, using a semi-structured interview guide printed in both English and IsiZulu. The interviews were audio-recorded transcribed and translated to English by a research team member competent in both languages. Data were imported to NVivo 10 for thematic analysis. The COREQ checklist was used to ensure that the study adheres to quality standards for reporting qualitative research.

resultsChild-friendly spaces contributed to the centredness of care for children in PHCs. This was evidenced by the increased involvement and participation of children, increased PCGs' participation in the care of their children and a positive transformation of the PHC to a therapeutic environment for children. Several barriers impeding the success of child-friendly spaces were reported including space challenges; clashing health facility priorities; inadequate management support; inadequate training on how to maximise the child-friendly spaces and lastly the inappropriateness of existing child-friendly spaces for much older children.

conclusionChild-friendly spaces promote HIV positive children's right to participation and agency in accessing care. However, more rigorous quantitative evaluation is required to determine their impact on children's HIV-related health outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansMalePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementChild-centred careChild-friendly environmentChild-friendly spacesChildrenHIVKidzAlive trained and mentored HCWsPlay therapyPrimary caregivers

Identifiers

PMID31964361
PMCPMC6975036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.