Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964155›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2020

A recurrent case of pituicytoma 16 years later.

K J McNamara, S Shaw, N Saravanappa

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K J McNamaraDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
S ShawDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
N SaravanappaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
Royal Stoke University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPituicytoma is a rare; slow-growing primary tumour originating from the glial cells of the neurohypophysis. It was classed as a low-grade (grade I) central nervous system tumour by the World Health Organization in 2007. We present the case of a 71-year-old man with a previous history of sellar meningioma who underwent surgical resection of pituicytoma by transphenoidal hypophysectomy.

methodWe conducted a literature search using Medline EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using the Ovid search engines. Key words searched were 'pituitary gland', 'pituicytoma', 'neurohypophysis'. Patient records and imaging were obtained from the Royal Stoke University Hospital database.

resultsA 71-year-old man with a background of sellar meningioma 16 years previously was found to have a pituitary fossa tumour on surveillance magnetic resonance imaging. Differential diagnosis was pituitary adenoma. Endoscopic transphenoidal hypophysectomy was performed. Histology was consistent with pituicytoma. As a result of this histology from his initial tumour was re-examined and was amended to pituicytoma, indicating a recurrence.

conclusionPituicytoma is a benign, slow growing lesion of the posterior pituitary. Brat

Indexed as

AgedDiagnostic ErrorsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningiomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPituitary Gland, PosteriorPituitary NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeHypophysectomyNeurosurgeryPituitary glandPosteriorSkull base

Identifiers

PMID31964155
PMCPMC7099168
OpenAlexW3001921509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.