Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31963903›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Development of the Nurses' Occupational Stressor Scale.

Yi-Chuan Chen, Yue-Liang Leon Guo, Li-Chan Lin, Yu-Ju Lee, Pei-Yi Hu, Jiune-Jye Ho, Judith Shu-Chu Shiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role conflict, job crafting, stress and resilience among nurses during COVID-19.Journal of contingencies and crisis management · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi-Chuan ChenSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU), No. 1, Ren-Ai Rd. Sec. 1, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7848-1383
Yue-Liang Leon GuoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU), No. 1, Ren-Ai Rd. Sec. 1, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8530-4809
Li-Chan LinInstitute of Clinical Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong Street, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Yu-Ju LeeSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU), No. 1, Ren-Ai Rd. Sec. 1, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
Pei-Yi HuInstitute of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health (ILOSH), Ministry of Labor, No. 99, Lane 407, Hengke Rd., New Taipei City 22143, Taiwan.
Jiune-Jye HoInstitute of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health (ILOSH), Ministry of Labor, No. 99, Lane 407, Hengke Rd., New Taipei City 22143, Taiwan.
Judith Shu-Chu ShiaoSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University (NTU), No. 1, Ren-Ai Rd. Sec. 1, Taipei 10051, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-0034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although nurses work in stressful environments, stressors in such environments have yet to be clearly assessed. This study aimed to develop a Nurses' Occupational Stressor Scale (NOSS) with high reliability and validity. Candidate questions for the NOSS were generated by expert consensus following focus group feedback, and were used to survey in 2013. A shorter version was then developed after examination for validity and reproducibility in 2014. The accuracy of the short version of the NOSS for predicting nurses' stress levels was evaluated based on receiver operating characteristic curves to compare existing instruments for measuring stress outcomes, namely personal burnout, client-related burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intention to leave. Examination for validity and reproducibility yielded a shorter version of NOSS with only 21 items was considered sufficient for measuring stressors in nurses' work environments. Nine subscales were included: (1) work demands, (2) work-family conflict, (3) insufficient support from coworkers or caregivers, (4) workplace violence and bullying, (5) organizational issues, (6) occupational hazards, (7) difficulty taking leave, (8) powerlessness, and (9) unmet basic physiological needs. The 21-item NOSS proved to have high concurrent and construct validity. The correlation coefficients of the subscales for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.71 to 0.83. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) coefficients ranged from 0.35 to 0.77. The NOSS exhibited accurate prediction of personal burnout, client-related burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intention to leave.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionNursesOccupational StressReproducibility of ResultsWork-Life BalanceWorkloadWorkplaceWorkplace Violencenurseoccupational stressorscale developmentstressor scalework environment

Identifiers

PMID31963903
PMCPMC7014241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.