Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31963804›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Saliva Secretion and Swallowing-The Impact of Different Types of Food and Drink on Subsequent Intake.

Catherina Bozorgi, Celina Holleufer, Karin Wendin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherina BozorgiFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4618-6819
Celina HolleuferFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7014-3934
Karin WendinFaculty of Natural Sciences, Kristianstad University, SE-291 39 Kristianstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7249-2628
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

VINNOVA 2018-00305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oral processing of food is important for eating and digestion in order to gain energy and nutrients. Due to disease, injury, or aging, individuals may experience difficulties in this process. These difficulties often lead to dysphagia, which is associated with malnutrition. Thus, it is of importance to find solutions and strategies to enable food intake. It is well known that sour and/or carbonated foods and drinks increase saliva secretion and trigger the swallowing reflex. However, knowledge regarding how subsequent food intake is impacted is lacking. The aim of this study was to clarify whether sour and/or carbonated foods and drinks had subsequent impacts on swallowing function. Twelve healthy participants evaluated eleven foods and drinks in terms of their ability to increase saliva production and ease the swallowing of subsequent food. Results showed that sourness and carbonation had positive impacts on saliva secretion and swallowing. No correlation was found between the pH/sourness of the foods and the ease of swallowing them. It was concluded that the ingestion of cherry tomatoes, natural yoghurt, and, in particular, citrus juice made swallowing of a neutral cracker easier. These results may be used to increase food intake among dysphagia patients.

Indexed as

BeveragesDeglutitionDrinkingEatingFoodSalivationAdultCarbonated WaterFemaleFruit and Vegetable JuicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRandom AllocationReflexCarbonated Waterease of swallowfood oral processingmalnutritionnutrition

Identifiers

PMID31963804
PMCPMC7019672
OpenAlexW2999942823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.