Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31963772›Full record

ReviewInsects2020

Alexis Dziedziech, Sai Shivankar, Ulrich Theopold

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genes · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cell-death induced immune response and coagulopathy promote cachexia inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Activin Branch Ligand Daw Regulates theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Potentially Virulent Multi-Drug ResistantDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. The nematode parasitemicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Distinctive features ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Immune Response ofInsects · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexis DziedziechDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute (MBW), Stockholm University,10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Sai ShivankarDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute (MBW), Stockholm University,10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrich TheopoldDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute (MBW), Stockholm University,10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

Cancerfonden CAN 2010/553 and CAN 2013/546Vetenskapsrådet VR-2010-5988 and VR 2016-04077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several insect innate immune mechanisms are activated in response to infection by entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). In this review, we focus on the coagulation of hemolymph, which acts to stop bleeding after injury and prevent access of pathogens to the body cavity. After providing a general overview of invertebrate coagulation systems, we discuss recent findings in

Indexed as

clottingcoagulationhemocytesinnate immunityinsect immunitynematodesphenoloxidasesecretiontransglutaminase

Identifiers

PMID31963772
PMCPMC7023112
OpenAlexW2998868815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.