Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31963500›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Ex-Vivo Treatment of Tumor Tissue Slices as a Predictive Preclinical Method to Evaluate Targeted Therapies for Patients with Renal Carcinoma.

Caroline Roelants, Catherine Pillet, Quentin Franquet, Clément Sarrazin, Nicolas Peilleron, Sofia Giacosa, Laurent Guyon, Amina Fontanell, Gaëlle Fiard, Jean-Alexandre Long and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances and challenges in human 3D solid tumor models.Advanced functional materials · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A hitchhiker's guide to cancer models.Trends in biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline RoelantsUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Catherine PilletUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biologie à Grande Echelle, UMR 1038, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Quentin FranquetUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Clément SarrazinUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Nicolas PeilleronUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Sofia GiacosaUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Laurent GuyonUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-2348
Amina FontanellCentre hospitalier universitaire Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France.
Gaëlle FiardCentre hospitalier universitaire Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-5318
Jean-Alexandre LongCentre hospitalier universitaire Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France.
Jean-Luc DescotesCentre hospitalier universitaire Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France.
Claude CochetUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Odile FilholUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CEA, IRIG-Biology of Cancer and Infection, UMR_S 1036, F-38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1964-7958
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FR

Funding

Association Française d'Urologie FellowshipGrenoble Alliance for Integrated Structural & Cell Biology GRALGroupement des Entreprises Françaises dans la LUtte contre le Cancer GEFLUCLigue Contre le Cancer Isère
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the third type of urologic cancer. At time of diagnosis, 30% of cases are metastatic with no effect of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Current targeted therapies lead to a high rate of relapse and resistance after a short-term response. Thus, a major hurdle in the development and use of new treatments for ccRCC is the lack of good pre-clinical models that can accurately predict the efficacy of new drugs and allow the stratification of patients into the correct treatment regime. Here, we describe different 3D cultures models of ccRCC, emphasizing the feasibility and the advantage of ex-vivo treatment of fresh, surgically resected human tumor slice cultures of ccRCC as a robust preclinical model for identifying patient response to specific therapeutics. Moreover, this model based on precision-cut tissue slices enables histopathology measurements as tumor architecture is retained, including the spatial relationship between the tumor and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the stromal components. Our data suggest that acute treatment of tumor tissue slices could represent a benchmark of further exploration as a companion diagnostic tool in ccRCC treatment and a model to develop new therapeutic drugs.

Indexed as

drug sensitivityimmune infiltrationrenal cancertargeted therapytumor slice culture

Identifiers

PMID31963500
PMCPMC7016787
OpenAlexW2999407608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.