ReviewMicroorganisms2020
Detection and Identification of
Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial resistance profiling and phenotypic characterization of archived clinicalMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Emerging point-of-care technologies for bacterial pathogen detection.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026Review
- TrackingACS omega · 2026Review
- From pathogenicity to therapy: Investigating the Therapeutic Potential of Bacillus anthracis Anthrax Toxin in Novel Cancer Therapies and Oncological Research.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Decontamination of Soil Contaminated at the Surface withEnvironmental engineering science · 2025Article
- Biosensors and Bioassays for the Medical Detection ofCurrent medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Architecture of the Sap S-layer ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Anthrax: A narrative review.New microbes and new infections · 2024Review
- Article
- Get to Know Your Neighbors: Characterization of CloseMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Human Anthrax: Update of the Diagnosis and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Anthrax revisited: how assessing the unpredictable can improve biosecurity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- A CRISPR/Cas12a-based DNAzyme visualization system for rapid, non-electrically dependent detection ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2022Article
- Tyroviruses are a new group of temperate phages that infect Bacillus species in soil environments worldwide.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Recent advances in airborne pathogen detection using optical and electrochemical biosensors.Analytica chimica acta · 2022Review
- Identification of Universally Applicable and Species-Specific Marker Peptides forLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization of a Bacillus cereus strain associated with a large feed-related outbreak of severe infection in pigs.Journal of applied microbiology · 2022Article
- Transmission of Zoonotic Diseases in the Daily Life of AncientAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Potential Use for Serosurveillance of Feral Swine to Map Risk for Anthrax Exposure, Texas, USA.Emerging infectious diseases · 2021Article
- A Suggested Diagnostic Approach for Sporadic Anthrax in Cattle to Protect Public Health.Microorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and reliable identification of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.