Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31963205›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Chemical Mechanisms of Nanoparticle Radiosensitization and Radioprotection: A Review of Structure-Function Relationships Influencing Reactive Oxygen Species.

Douglas Howard, Sonia Sebastian, Quy Van-Chanh Le, Benjamin Thierry, Ivan Kempson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. X-ray radio-enhancement by TiBiomaterials science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas HowardFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia.
Sonia SebastianFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia.
Quy Van-Chanh LeFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia.
Benjamin ThierryFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6757-2842
Ivan KempsonFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, Australia.
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP190102119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal nanoparticles are of increasing interest with respect to radiosensitization. The physical mechanisms of dose enhancement from X-rays interacting with nanoparticles has been well described theoretically, however have been insufficient in adequately explaining radiobiological response. Further confounding experimental observations is examples of radioprotection. Consequently, other mechanisms have gained increasing attention, especially via enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to chemical-based mechanisms. Despite the large number of variables differing between published studies, a consensus identifies ROS-related mechanisms as being of significant importance. Understanding the structure-function relationship in enhancing ROS generation will guide optimization of metal nanoparticle radiosensitisers with respect to maximizing oxidative damage to cancer cells. This review highlights the physico-chemical mechanisms involved in enhancing ROS, commonly used assays and experimental considerations, variables involved in enhancing ROS generation and damage to cells and identifies current gaps in the literature that deserve attention. ROS generation and the radiobiological effects are shown to be highly complex with respect to nanoparticle physico-chemical properties and their fate within cells. There are a number of potential biological targets impacted by enhancing, or scavenging, ROS which add significant complexity to directly linking specific nanoparticle properties to a macroscale radiobiological result.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMetal NanoparticlesModels, TheoreticalOxidation-ReductionRadiation ProtectionReactive Oxygen SpeciesStructure-Activity RelationshipReactive Oxygen Speciesmetal nanoparticleradioprotectionradiosensitizationreactive oxygen speciesROS

Identifiers

PMID31963205
PMCPMC7013516
OpenAlexW2999891965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.