ArticlePhysical review. E2019
Model reduction of rigid-body molecular dynamics via generalized multipole potentials.
Article in Physical review. E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivated by the challenges of uncertainty quantification for coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics, we investigate the role of perturbation theory in model reduction of classical systems. In particular, we consider the task of coarse-graining rigid bodies in the context of generalized multipole potentials that have controllable levels of accuracy relative to their atomistic counterparts. We show how the multipole framework yields a hierarchy of models that systematically connects a CG "point molecule" approximation to the exact dynamics. We use these results to understand when and how the CG models fail to describe atomistic dynamics at the trajectory level and develop asymptotic error estimates for approximate molecular potential energies. Implications for other model-reduction strategies are also discussed. Key findings of this work are that (i) omitting rotational energy introduces significant error when coarse-graining and (ii) attention to symmetry can improve accuracy of "point-molecule" approximations. Analytical derivations and numerical results support these conclusions. Relevance to nonrigid bodies is also discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.