ArticlePhysical review. E2019
Unified mechanism of local drivers in a percolation model of atrial fibrillation.
Article in Physical review. E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The risk factors of atrial substrate remodeling in the patients of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation following pulmonary vein isolation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Mechanistic Insights From Trials of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Charting a Course for the Future.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2024Review
- Electrogram Morphology Recurrence for Mapping Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Initial vs Redo Catheter Ablation.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2023Article
- Identifying locations susceptible to micro-anatomical reentry using a spatial network representation of atrial fibre maps.PloS one · 2022Article
- Percolation and tortuosity in heart-like cells.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Understanding the transition from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation.Physical review researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) are poorly understood, resulting in disappointing success rates of ablative treatment. Different mechanisms defined largely by different atrial activation patterns have been proposed and, arguably, this dispute has slowed the progress of AF research. Recent clinical evidence suggests a unifying mechanism of local drivers based on sustained reentrant circuits in the complex atrial architecture. Here, we present a percolation inspired computational model showing spontaneous emergence of AF that strongly supports, and gives a theoretical explanation for, the clinically observed diversity of activation. We show that the difference in surface activation patterns is a direct consequence of the thickness of the discrete network of heart muscle cells through which electrical signals percolate to reach the imaged surface. The model naturally follows the clinical spectrum of AF spanning sinus rhythm, paroxysmal AF, and persistent AF as the decoupling of myocardial cells results in the lattice approaching the percolation threshold. This allows the model to make the prediction that, for paroxysmal AF, reentrant circuits emerge near the endocardium, but in persistent AF they emerge deeper in the bulk of the atrial wall. If experimentally verified, this may go towards explaining the lowering ablation success rate as AF becomes more persistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.