SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020
Probiotics for people with cystic fibrosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prebiotics for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of race distance and probiotics intervention on kidney, muscle, and gut injury and inflammation biomarker responses during running.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Trial
- The impact of probiotics on pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and growth outcomes in pediatric cystic fibrosis: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Mitochondria Meet the Lung Microbiome: A Bidirectional Dialogue in Inflammation and Respiratory Diseases.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota-derived metabolites and host interactions in fibrotic diseases: mechanisms, cross-organ signatures, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Assessment of the Isolated and Combined Impact of β-Glucan andNutrients · 2025Article
- Impact of Nutritional Status on Pulmonary Function in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study from Upper Egypt.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A pharmacovigilance study on probiotic preparations based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from 2005 to 2023.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Research progress on the application ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Impact of high-dose cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and inulin prebiotic on intestinal and airway microbiota in adults with cystic fibrosis: A 2 × 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot study.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2024Article
- Oocyte Aging: A Multifactorial Phenomenon in A Unique Cell.Aging and disease · 2024Review
- Positioning the preventive potential of microbiome treatments for cystic fibrosis in the context of current therapies.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Review
- Lung Microbiota: Its Relationship to Respiratory System Diseases and Approaches for Lung-Targeted Probiotic Bacteria Delivery.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Respiratory and Intestinal Microbiota in Pediatric Lung Diseases-Current Evidence of the Gut-Lung Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Lung-Directed Bacteriotherapy in Cystic Fibrosis: Could It Be an Option?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Intestinal Inflammation and Alterations in the Gut Microbiota in Cystic Fibrosis: A Review of the Current Evidence, Pathophysiology and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- What Do We Know about the Microbiome in Cystic Fibrosis? Is There a Role for Probiotics and Prebiotics?Nutrients · 2022Review
- Extremely small and incredibly close: Gut microbes as modulators of inflammation and targets for therapeutic intervention.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Infants with cystic fibrosis have altered fecal functional capacities with potential clinical and metabolic consequences.BMC microbiology · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCystic fibrosis (CF) is a multisystem disease and the importance of growth and nutrition has been well established, given its implications for lung function and overall survival. It has been established that intestinal dysbiosis (i.e. microbial imbalance) and inflammation is present in people with CF. Probiotics are commercially available (over-the-counter) and may improve both intestinal and overall health.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics for improving health outcomes in children and adults with CF. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. Date of last register search: 20 January 2020. We also searched ongoing trials registries and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of last search: 29 January 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing efficacies and safety of probiotics in children and adults with CF. Cross-over RCTs with a washout phase were included and for those without a washout period, only the first phase of each trial was analysed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials; we used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. We contacted trial authors for additional data. Meta-analyses were undertaken on outcomes at several time points. MAIN
resultsWe identified 17 trials and included 12 RCTs (11 completed and one trial protocol - this trial was terminated early) (464 participants). Eight trials included only children, whilst four trials included both children and adults. Trial duration ranged from one to 12 months. Nine trials compared a probiotic (seven single strain and three multistrain preparations) with a placebo preparation, two trials compared a synbiotic (multistrain) with a placebo preparation and one trial compared two probiotic preparations. Overall we judged the risk of bias in the 12 trials to be low. Three trials had a high risk of performance bias, two trials a high risk of attrition bias and six trials a high risk of reporting bias. Only two trials were judged to have low or unclear risk of bias for all domains. Four trials were sponsored by grants only, two trials by industry only, two trials by both grants and industry and three trials had an unknown funding source. Combined data from four trials (225 participants) suggested probiotics may reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations during a four to 12 month time-frame, mean difference (MD) -0.32 episodes per participant (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.68 to 0.03; P = 0.07) (low-certainty evidence); however, the 95% CI includes the possibility of both an increased and a reduced number of exacerbations. Additionally, two trials (127 participants) found no evidence of an effect on the duration of antibiotic therapy during the same time period. Combined data from four trials (177 participants) demonstrated probiotics may reduce faecal calprotectin, MD -47.4 µg/g (95% CI -93.28 to -1.54; P = 0.04) (low-certainty evidence), but the results for other biomarkers mainly did not show any difference between probiotics and placebo. Two trials (91 participants) found no evidence of effect on height, weight or body mass index (low-certainty evidence). Combined data from five trials (284 participants) suggested there was no difference in lung function (forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV AUTHORS'
conclusionsProbiotics significantly reduce faecal calprotectin (a marker of intestinal inflammation) in children and adults with CF, however the clinical implications of this require further investigation. Probiotics may make little or no difference to pulmonary exacerbation rates, however, further evidence is required before firm conclusions can be made. Probiotics are associated with a small number of adverse events including vomiting, diarrhoea and allergic reactions. In children and adults with CF, probiotics may be considered by patients and their healthcare providers. Given the variability of probiotic composition and dosage, further adequately-powered multicentre RCTs of at least 12 months duration are required to best assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics for children and adults with CF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.