Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31962235›Full record

ArticleiScience2020

Neuromotor Dynamics of Human Locomotion in Challenging Settings.

Alessandro Santuz, Leon Brüll, Antonis Ekizos, Arno Schroll, Nils Eckardt, Armin Kibele, Michael Schwenk, Adamantios Arampatzis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro SantuzDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Atlantic Mobility Action Project, Brain Repair Centre, Department of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada. Electronic address: alessandro.santuz@hu-berlin.de.
Leon BrüllDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Network Aging Research, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Antonis EkizosDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Arno SchrollDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Nils EckardtDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute for Sport and Sports Science, University of Kassel, 34125 Kassel, Germany; Department of Sport and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Armin KibeleDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute for Sport and Sports Science, University of Kassel, 34125 Kassel, Germany.
Michael SchwenkNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Sports and Sports Sciences, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Adamantios ArampatzisDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Kassel · DEDalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is the control of movement less stable when we walk or run in challenging settings? Intuitively, one might answer that it is, given that challenging locomotion externally (e.g., rough terrain) or internally (e.g., age-related impairments) makes our movements more unstable. Here, we investigated how young and old humans synergistically activate muscles during locomotion when different perturbation levels are introduced. Of these control signals, called muscle synergies, we analyzed the local stability and the complexity (or irregularity) over time. Surprisingly, we found that perturbations force the central nervous system to produce muscle activation patterns that are less unstable and less complex. These outcomes show that robust locomotion control in challenging settings is achieved by producing less complex control signals that are more stable over time, whereas easier tasks allow for more unstable and irregular control.

Indexed as

Behavioral NeuroscienceBiological SciencesNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID31962235
PMCPMC6971393
OpenAlexW2997681105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.