Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961908›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Interventions for incarcerated adults with opioid use disorder in the United States: A systematic review with a focus on social determinants of health.

Olivia K Sugarman, Marcus A Bachhuber, Ashley Wennerstrom, Todd Bruno, Benjamin F Springgate

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A self-assessment of opioid use disorder services at a Pacific Northwest County jail.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivia K SugarmanCenter for Healthcare Value and Equity, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5682-9625
Marcus A BachhuberCenter for Healthcare Value and Equity, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-8382
Ashley WennerstromCenter for Healthcare Value and Equity, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
Todd BrunoSchwartz Law Firm, LLC, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States of America.
Benjamin F SpringgateCenter for Healthcare Value and Equity, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incarceration poses significant health risks for people involved in the criminal justice system. As the world's leader in incarceration, the United States incarcerated population is at higher risk for infectious diseases, mental illness, and substance use disorder. Previous studies indicate that the mortality rate for people coming out of prison is almost 13 times higher than that of the general population; opioids contribute to nearly 1 in 8 post-release fatalities overall, and almost half of all overdose deaths. Given the hazardous intersection of incarceration, opioid use disorder, and social determinants of health, we systematically reviewed recent evidence on interventions for opioid use disorder (OUD) implemented as part of United States criminal justice system involvement, with an emphasis on social determinants of health (SDOH). We searched academic literature to identify eligible studies of an intervention for OUD that was implemented in the context of criminal justice system involvement (e.g., incarceration or parole/probation) for adults ages 19 and older. From 6,604 citations, 13 publications were included in final synthesis. Most interventions were implemented in prisons (n = 6 interventions), used medication interventions (n = 10), and did not include SDOH as part of the study design (n = 8). Interventions that initiated medication treatment early and throughout incarceration had significant, positive effects on opioid use outcomes. Evidence supports medication treatment administered throughout the period of criminal justice involvement as an effective method of improving post-release outcomes in individuals with criminal justice involvement. While few studies included SDOH components, many investigators recognized SDOH needs as competing priorities among justice-involved individuals. This review suggests an evidence gap; evidence-based interventions that address OUD and SDOH in the context of criminal justice involvement are urgently needed.

Indexed as

PrisonersSocial Determinants of HealthAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCriminal LawEarly Medical InterventionHumansMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPrisonsUnited StatesYoung AdultAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID31961908
PMCPMC6974320
OpenAlexW3002510375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.