Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961905›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

From the host's point of view: Effects of variation in burying beetle brood care and brood size on the interaction with parasitic mites.

Petra Schedwill, Sophia Paschkewitz, Heide Teubner, Nadine Steinmetz, Volker Nehring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra SchedwillEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sophia PaschkewitzEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Heide TeubnerEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Nadine SteinmetzEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Volker NehringEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-1428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fitness and virulence of parasites is often determined by how many resources they can wrangle out of their hosts. Host defenses that help to keep resources from the parasites will then reduce virulence and parasite fitness. Here, we study whether host brood care and brood size regulation can protect host fitness and harm a parasite. We use the biparental brood-caring burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides and its phoretic Poecilochirus carabi mites as a model. Since paternal brood care does not seem to benefit the offspring in a clean laboratory setting, the male presence has been suggested to strengthen the defense against parasites. We manipulated male presence and found no effect on the fitness of the parasitic mites or the beetle offspring. We further manipulated beetle brood size and found larger broods to reduce parasite fitness. The specific pattern we observed suggests that beetle larvae are strong competitors and consume the carrion resource before all parasites develop. They thus starve the parasites. These results shed new light on the observation that the parasites appear to reduce host brood size early on-potentially to avert later competition their offspring might have to face.

Indexed as

ColeopteraHost-Parasite InteractionsLarvaAnimalsBehavior, AnimalClutch SizeCompetitive BehaviorMaleMitesParasites

Identifiers

PMID31961905
PMCPMC6974135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.