Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961882›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Clinicians' communication with patients receiving a MCI diagnosis: The ABIDE project.

Leonie N C Visser, Ingrid S van Maurik, Femke H Bouwman, Salka Staekenborg, Ralph Vreeswijk, Liesbeth Hempenius, Marlijn H de Beer, Gerwin Roks, Leo Boelaarts, Mariska Kleijer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the views of key stakeholders on dementia risk prediction in primary care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The expectations and experiences of patients regarding the diagnostic workup at a specialized memory clinic: An interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Leonie N C VisserDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3487-7938
Ingrid S van MaurikAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-8340
Femke H BouwmanAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Salka StaekenborgDepartment of Neurology, Tergooi Ziekenhuis, Blaricum, The Netherlands.
Ralph VreeswijkDepartment of Clinical Geriatrics, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth HempeniusGeriatric Center, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Marlijn H de BeerDepartment of Neurology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands.
Gerwin RoksDepartment of Neurology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Leo BoelaartsGeriatric Department, NoordWest Ziekenhuis Groep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Mariska KleijerDepartment of Neurology, LangeLand Ziekenhuis, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8766-6224
Ellen M A SmetsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLLange Land Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLTergooi · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to explore clinicians' communication, including the discussion of diagnosis, cause, prognosis and care planning, in routine post-diagnostic testing consultations with patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

methodsThematic content analysis was used to analyze audiotaped consultations in which 10 clinicians (eight neurologists and two geriatricians) from 7 memory clinics, disclosed diagnostic information to 13 MCI patients and their care partners. We assessed clinician-patient communication regarding diagnostic label, cause, prognosis and care planning to identify core findings.

resultsCore findings were: clinicians 1) differed in how they informed about the MCI label; 2) tentatively addressed cause of symptoms; 3) (implicitly) steered against further biomarker testing; 4) rarely informed about the patient's risk of developing dementia; 5) often informed about the expected course of symptoms emphasizing potential symptom stabilization and/or improvement, and; 6) did not engage in a conversation on long-term (care) planning. DISCUSSION: Clinicians' information provision about the underlying cause, prognosis and implications for long-term (care) planning in MCI could be more specific. Since most patients and care partners have a strong need to understand the patient's symptoms, and for information on the prognosis and implications for the future, clinicians' current approach may not match with those needs.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient Education as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and ConsultationAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningPrognosisQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31961882
PMCPMC6974141
OpenAlexW3001298707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.