ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2020
Test-Retest Repeatability of [
Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing a Small Molecule for PET Radiotracing: [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Oral Administration of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Numerical simulation method for the assessment of the effect of molar activity on the pharmacokinetics of radioligands in small animals.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024Article
- Quantification of P-glycoprotein function at the human blood-brain barrier using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- PET imaging of animal models with depressive-like phenotypes.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Review
- Effect of P-glycoprotein Inhibition on the Penetration of Ceftriaxone Across the Blood-Brain Barrier.Neurochemical research · 2022Article
- Article
- Pharmacokinetic Modeling of [Molecular pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- PET Imaging of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In longitudinal PET studies, animals are repeatedly anesthetized which may affect the repeatability of PET measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of anesthesia on the P-gp function as well as the reproducibility of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.