SynthesisInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Diagnosis accuracy of PCA3 level in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunoediting and precision biomarkers in prostate cancer: The emerging role of liquid biopsy, immune contexture and HLA genotype (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of multidimensional nomograms for predicting prostate cancer risk: a retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Identification of prostate cancer by urinary DLX1/HOXC6 expression in Chinese population with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advance in prostate cancer biomarker discovery: bridging detection, prognosis and therapeutics.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Performance of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG Within the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator Version 2 in a Lithuanian Cohort.Research and reports in urology · 2025Article
- miRNA Expression Patterns in Early- and Late-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients: High-Throughput Analysis.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer through urine metabolomic signatures: A large-scale validated study.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Follow-Up Biomarkers in the Evolution of Prostate Cancer, Levels ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Personalized management of prostate cancer: from molecular and imaging markers to radiogenomics.Polish journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Intermittent Hormone Therapy Models Analysis and Bayesian Model Comparison for Prostate Cancer.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Up-Regulation of LINC00665 Facilitates the Malignant Progression of Prostate Cancer by Epigenetically Silencing KLF2 Through EZH2 and LSD1.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Increase in submissions to International Brazilian Journal of Urology during Covid-19 quarentine.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Impact of lifestyle in prostate cancer patients. What should we do?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnostic value and suitability of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) have been inconsistent in previous studies. Thus, the aim of the present meta-analysis was performed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of PCA3 for PCa. MATERIALS AND
methodsA meta-analysis was performed to search relevant studies using online databases EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science published until February 1st, 2019. Ultimately, 65 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis with 8.139 cases and 14.116 controls. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (LR+), negative likelihood ratios (LR-), and other measures of PCA3 were pooled and determined to evaluate the diagnostic rate of PCa by the random-effect model.
resultsWith PCA3, the pooled overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for predicting significant PCa were 0.68 (0.64-0.72), 0.72 (0.68-0.75), 2.41 (2.16-2.69), 0.44 (0.40-0.49), respectively. Besides, the summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% CIs for PCA3 was 5.44 (4.53-6.53). In addition, the area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves and 95% CIs was 0.76 (0.72-0.79). The major design deficiencies of included studies were differential verification bias, and a lack of clear inclusion and exclusion criteria.
conclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis suggested that PCA3 was a non-invasive method with the acceptable sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PCa, to distinguish between patients and healthy individuals. To validate the potential applicability of PCA3 in the diagnosis of PCa, more rigorous studies were needed to confirm these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.