Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961622›Full record

ReviewInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Surgical treatment of bulbar urethral strictures: tips and tricks.

Guido Barbagli, Marco Bandini, Sofia Balò, Salvatore Sansalone, Denis Butnaru, Massimo Lazzeri

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Story of Female Urethral Stricture - "To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail".International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  10. A new double graft technique in urethroplasty for complex urethral stenosis: preliminary findings.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guido BarbagliInternational Center for Reconstructive Urethral Surgery, Arezzo, Italy.
Marco BandiniUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Sofia BalòInternational Center for Reconstructive Urethral Surgery, Arezzo, Italy.
Salvatore SansaloneDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Denis ButnaruInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Massimo LazzeriDepartment of Urology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Clinical and Research Hospital (ML), Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Center For Reconstructive Urethral Surgery · ITClinical Hospital No. 8 · RUSechenov University · RUUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical treatment of bulbar urethral strictures is still one of the most challenging reconstructive surgery problems. Bulbar urethral strictures are usually categorized as traumatic and non-traumatic strictures depending on the aetiology. The traumatic strictures are caused by trauma and they determine disruption of the urethra with obliteration of the urethral lumen, ending with fibrotic gaps between the urethral ends. Differently, the non-traumatic urethral strictures are mainly caused by catheterization, instrumentation, and infection, or they can also be idiopathic. They are usually asso-ciated with spongiofibrosis of the segment of the urethra that has been involved. Worldwide, two different surgical approaches are currently adopted for bulbar urethral repair: transecting techniques with end-to-end anastomosis and non-transecting techniques followed by grafting. Traumatic obliterated strictures require transection of the urethra allowing complete removal of the fibrotic tissue that involves the urethral ends. Conversely, non-traumatic, non-obliterated urethral strictures require augmentation of the urethral plate using oral mucosa grafts. Nowadays, it is still difficult to choose the correct surgical management for non-obliterated bulbar stricture repair. Indeed, different surgical techniques have been proposed (pedicled flap vs free graft, dorsal vs ventral placement of the graft, non-transecting technique using or non-using free graft, etc.) but none emerged as the best solution since all techniques have showed similar success and complication rates. Consequently, the final choice is still based on surgeon's preferences and patient's characteristics. Within the current manuscript, we like to present some of our tips and tricks that we developed along our prolonged surgical experience on the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. These might be of interest for surgeons that approach this complex surgery. Moreover, our suggestions want to be useful regardless the type of chosen technique being adaptable for different scenario.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresUrethral StrictureHumansMaleMouth MucosaTreatment OutcomeUrethraUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleAnastomosis, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeUrethra

Identifiers

PMID31961622
PMCPMC7239284
OpenAlexW3012427444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.