Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961620›Full record

ReviewInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Urethral injury in penile fracture: a narrative review.

Rodrigo Barros, José Genilson Alves Ribeiro, Heleno Augusto Moreira da Silva, Flávio Rondinelli de Sá, Angelo Maurilio Fosse, Luciano A Favorito

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Bladder Cancer highlighted.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo BarrosDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
José Genilson Alves RibeiroDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Heleno Augusto Moreira da SilvaDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Flávio Rondinelli de SáDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Angelo Maurilio FosseDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Luciano A FavoritoUnidade de Pesquisa Urogenital, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present the evolution and the recent data on the etiology, diagnosis, management and outcomes of penile fracture (PF) with concomitant urethral injury. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched the Pubmed database between 1998 and 2019 using the following key words: "penile fracture", "fracture of penis", "trauma to penis", "rupture of corpora cavernosa", "urethral injury", "urethral rupture" and "urethral reconstruction".

resultsThe incidence of urethral lesion in patients with PF varies by geographic region and etiology. Blood in the meatus, hematuria and voiding symptoms are highly indicative of urethral rupture. The diagnosis of PF is eminently clinical and complementary exams are not necessary. The treatment consists of urethral reconstruction and the most common complications found are urethral stenosis and urethrocutaneous fistula.

conclusionPF is an uncommon urological emergency, particularly in cases with urethral involvement. Urethral injury should be suspected in the presence of suggestive clinical signs, and diagnosis is usually clinical. Urgent urethral reconstruction is man-datory and produces satisfactory results with low levels of complications.

Indexed as

Penile DiseasesHumansMalePenisRuptureUrethraUrethral DiseasesPenisUrethraUrethral Stricture

Identifiers

PMID31961620
PMCPMC7025847
OpenAlexW3008108600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.