Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961428›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2020

Trends in Pediatric Primary Care Visits Among Commercially Insured US Children, 2008-2016.

Kristin N Ray, Zhuo Shi, Ishani Ganguli, Aarti Rao, E John Orav, Ateev Mehrotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Economic burden of childhood overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tiny patients, huge impact: a call to action.Frontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin N RayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Zhuo ShiDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ishani GanguliDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aarti RaoIcahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York City, New York.
E John OravDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Optimizing Pediatric Subspecialty Care Through Telemedicine and e-ConsultationsK23HD088642 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RAY, KRISTIN N · 2017 to 2020
$520k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD088642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Primary care is the foundation of pediatric care. While policy interventions have focused on improving access and quality of primary care, trends in overall use of primary care among children have not been described. Objective: To assess trends in primary care visit rates and out-of-pocket costs, to examine variation in these trends by patient and visit characteristics, and to assess shifts to alternative care options (eg, retail clinics, urgent care, and telemedicine). Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational cohort study of claims data from 2008 to 2016 for children 17 years and younger covered by a large national commercial health plan. Visit rate per 100 child-years was determined for each year overall, by child and geographic characteristics, and by visit type (eg, primary diagnosis), and trends were assessed with a series of child-year Poisson models. Data were analyzed from November 2017 to September 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visits to primary care and other settings. Results: This cohort study included more than 71 million pediatric primary care visits over 29 million pediatric child-years (51% male in 2008 and 2016; 37% between 12-17 years in 2008 and 38% between 12-17 years in 2016). Unadjusted results for primary care visit rates per 100 child-years decreased from 259.6 in 2008 to 227.2 in 2016, yielding a regression-estimated change in primary care visits across the 9 years of -14.4% (95% CI, -15.0% to -13.9%; absolute change: -32.4 visits per 100 child-years). After controlling for shifts in demographics, the relative decrease was -12.8% (95% CI, -13.3% to -12.2%). Preventive care visits per 100 child-years increased from 74.9 in 2008 to 83.2 visits in 2016 (9.9% change in visit rate; 95% CI, 9.0%-10.9%; absolute change: 8.3 visits per 100 child-years), while problem-based visits per 100 child-years decreased from 184.7 in 2008 to 144.1 in 2016 (-24.1%; 95% CI, -24.6% to -23.5%; absolute change: -40.6 visits per 100 child-years). Visit rates decreased for all diagnostic groups except for the behavioral and psychiatric category. Out-of-pocket costs for problem-based primary care visits increased by 42% during the same period. Per 100 child-years, visits to other acute care venues increased from 21.3 to 27.6 (30.3%; 95% CI, 28.5% to 32.1%; absolute change: 6.3 visits per 100 child-years) and visits to specialists from 45.2 to 53.5 (16.4%; 95% CI, 14.8% to 18.0%, absolute change: 8.3 visits per 100 child-years). Conclusions and Relevance: Primary care visit rates among commercially insured children decreased over the last decade. Increases in out-of-pocket costs and shifts to other venues appear to explain some of this decrease.

Indexed as

Insurance CoverageAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOffice VisitsPediatricsPrimary Health CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31961428
PMCPMC6990970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.