Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961377›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2020

Association of Default Electronic Medical Record Settings With Health Care Professional Patterns of Opioid Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Quality Improvement Study.

Juan Carlos C Montoy, Zlatan Coralic, Andrew A Herring, Eben J Clattenburg, Maria C Raven

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04155229 (Effect of Default Electronic Health Record Settings on Clinician Opioid Prescribing Patterns in Emergency Departments), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04155229 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Default Electronic Health Record Settings on Clinician Opioid Prescribing Patterns in Emergency Departments

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2017Enrolled104ConditionsPain, Acute, Opioid Use, UnspecifiedArmsDefault settings for opioid prescriptions (acetaminophen/hydrocodone, oxycodone, acetaminophen/oxycodone)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Carlos C MontoyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Zlatan CoralicDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Andrew A HerringDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, California.
Eben J ClattenburgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, California.
Maria C RavenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prescription opioids play a significant role in the ongoing opioid crisis. Guidelines and physician education have had mixed success in curbing opioid prescriptions, highlighting the need for other tools that can change prescriber behavior, including nudges based in behavioral economics. Objective: To determine whether and to what extent changes in the default settings in the electronic medical record (EMR) are associated with opioid prescriptions for patients discharged from emergency departments (EDs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study randomly altered, during a series of five 4-week blocks, the prepopulated dispense quantities of discharge prescriptions for commonly prescribed opioids at 2 large, urban EDs. These changes were made without announcement, and prescribers were not informed of the study itself. Participants included all health care professionals (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) working clinically in either of the 2 EDs. Data were collected from November 28, 2016, through July 9, 2017, and analyzed from July 16, 2017, through May 14, 2018. Interventions: Default quantities for opioids were changed from status quo quantities of 12 and 20 tablets to null, 5, 10, and 15 tablets according to a block randomization scheme. Regardless of the default quantity, each health care professional decided for whom to prescribe opioids and could modify the quantity prescribed without restriction. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of tablets of opioid-containing medications prescribed under each default setting. Results: A total of 104 health care professionals wrote 4320 prescriptions for opioids during the study period. Using linear regression, an increase of 0.19 tablets prescribed (95% CI, 0.15-0.22) was found for each tablet increase in default quantity. When evaluating each of the 15 pairwise comparisons of default quantities (eg, 5 vs 15 tablets), a lower default was associated with a lower number of pills prescribed in more than half (8 of the 15) of the pairwise comparisons; there was a higher quantity in 1 and no difference in 6 comparisons. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that default settings in the EMR may influence the quantity of opioids prescribed by health care professionals. This low-cost, easily implementable, EMR-based intervention could have far-reaching implications for opioid prescribing and could be used as a tool to help combat the opioid epidemic. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04155229.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalQuality ImprovementAnalgesics, OpioidGuideline AdherenceHumansInappropriate PrescribingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug MisuseAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID31961377
PMCPMC6990860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.