Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961120›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2020

Layer-by-Layer Printing of Photopolymers in 3D: How Weak is the Interface?

H Gojzewski, Z Guo, W Grzelachowska, M G Ridwan, M A Hempenius, D W Grijpma, G J Vancso

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tailored Microcantilever Optimization for Multifrequency Force Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

H GojzewskiMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5 , 7522 NB Enschede , The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-8293
Z GuoDepartment of Biomaterials Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5 , 7522 NB Enschede , The Netherlands.
W GrzelachowskaMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5 , 7522 NB Enschede , The Netherlands.
M G RidwanMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5 , 7522 NB Enschede , The Netherlands.
M A HempeniusMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5 , 7522 NB Enschede , The Netherlands.
D W GrijpmaDepartment of Biomaterials Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5 , 7522 NB Enschede , The Netherlands.
G J VancsoMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Science and Technology , University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5 , 7522 NB Enschede , The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-0507
University of Twente · NLPoznań University of Technology · PLBandung Institute of Technology · IDNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing or, as also called, three-dimensional (3D) printing is considered as a game-changer in replacing traditional processing methods in numerous applications; yet, it has one intrinsic potential weakness related to bonding of layers formed during the printing process. Prior to finding solutions for improvement, a thorough quantitative understanding of the mechanical properties of the interface is needed. Here, a quantitative analysis of the nanomechanical properties in 3D printed photopolymers formed by digital light processing (DLP) stereolithography (SLA) is shown. Mapping of the contact Young's modulus across the layered structure is performed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) with a submicrometer resolution. The peakforce quantitative nanomechanical mapping (PF-QNM) mode was employed in the AFM experiments. The layered specimens were obtained from an acrylate-based resin (PR48, Autodesk), containing also a light-absorbing dye. We observed local depressions with values up to 30% of the maximum stiffness at the interface between the consecutively deposited layers, indicating local depletion of molecular cross-link density. The thickness values of the interfacial layers were approximately 11 μm, which corresponds to ∼22% of the total layer thickness (50 μm). We attribute this to heterogeneities of the photopolymerization reaction, related to (1) atmospheric oxygen inhibition and (2) molecular diffusion across the interface. Additionally, a pronounced stiffness decay was observed across each individual layer with a skewed profile. This behavior was rationalized by a spatial variation of the polymer cross-link density related to the variations of light absorption within the layers. This is caused by the presence of light absorbers in the printed material, resulting in a spatial decay of light intensity during photopolymerization.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingAFMelastic modulusinterfacephotopolymerstereolithography

Identifiers

PMID31961120
PMCPMC7033657
OpenAlexW3002828367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.