ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2020
Layer-by-Layer Printing of Photopolymers in 3D: How Weak is the Interface?
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifunctional implantable hydrogels: Smart platforms at the forefront of biomedical innovation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Fractographic analysis of 3D printed hybrid ceramic single crowns with different aging and post-curing times: an in-vitro study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From Unregulated Networks to Designed Microstructures: Introducing Heterogeneity at Different Length Scales in Photopolymers for Additive Manufacturing.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Multiscale mechanical characterization of biobased photopolymers towards sustainable vat polymerization 3D printing.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Results of an interlaboratory study on the working curve in vat photopolymerization.Additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Tailored Microcantilever Optimization for Multifrequency Force Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing of Hydrogels with Re-Adjustable Swelling.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Mechanical Behavior of 3D Printed Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Hydrogels in Hydrated Conditions Investigated Using Atomic Force Microscopy.ACS applied polymer materials · 2023Article
- Synergistic Fire Resistance of Nanobrick Wall Coated 3D Printed Photopolymer Lattices.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Nanoindentation Response of 3D Printed PEGDA Hydrogels in a Hydrated Environment.ACS applied polymer materials · 2023Article
- Biocompatibility and osteoinductive ability of casein phosphopeptide modified polyetheretherketone.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Lignin as a High-Value Bioaditive in 3D-DLP Printable Acrylic Resins and Polyaniline Conductive Composite.Polymers · 2022Article
- Rapid Scan EPR Oxygen Imaging in Photoactivated Resin Used for Stereolithographic 3D Printing.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2021Article
- Design and Fabrication of Organ-on-Chips: Promises and Challenges.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Additive Manufacturing for Automotive Applications: Mechanical and Weathering Durability of Vat Photopolymerization Materials.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2021Article
- Article
- Influence of the Manufacturing Method on the Adhesion ofPolymers · 2021Article
- Microscale Photopatterning of Through-thickness Modulus in a Monolithic and Functionally Graded 3D Printed Part.Small science · 2021Article
- Digital light processing in a hybrid atomic force microscope:Additive manufacturing · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing or, as also called, three-dimensional (3D) printing is considered as a game-changer in replacing traditional processing methods in numerous applications; yet, it has one intrinsic potential weakness related to bonding of layers formed during the printing process. Prior to finding solutions for improvement, a thorough quantitative understanding of the mechanical properties of the interface is needed. Here, a quantitative analysis of the nanomechanical properties in 3D printed photopolymers formed by digital light processing (DLP) stereolithography (SLA) is shown. Mapping of the contact Young's modulus across the layered structure is performed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) with a submicrometer resolution. The peakforce quantitative nanomechanical mapping (PF-QNM) mode was employed in the AFM experiments. The layered specimens were obtained from an acrylate-based resin (PR48, Autodesk), containing also a light-absorbing dye. We observed local depressions with values up to 30% of the maximum stiffness at the interface between the consecutively deposited layers, indicating local depletion of molecular cross-link density. The thickness values of the interfacial layers were approximately 11 μm, which corresponds to ∼22% of the total layer thickness (50 μm). We attribute this to heterogeneities of the photopolymerization reaction, related to (1) atmospheric oxygen inhibition and (2) molecular diffusion across the interface. Additionally, a pronounced stiffness decay was observed across each individual layer with a skewed profile. This behavior was rationalized by a spatial variation of the polymer cross-link density related to the variations of light absorption within the layers. This is caused by the presence of light absorbers in the printed material, resulting in a spatial decay of light intensity during photopolymerization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.