ArticlePhysiological reports2020
Chronic vagal nerve stimulation has no effect on tachycardia-induced heart failure progression or excitation-contraction coupling.
Article in Physiological reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vagal Nerve Stimulation Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmias and Mitigates Adverse Neural Cardiac Remodeling Post-Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2023Article
- Dynamic detection and reversal of myocardial ischemia using an artificially intelligent bioelectronic medicine.Science advances · 2022Article
- Chronic vagal nerve stimulation has no effect on tachycardia-induced heart failure progression or excitation-contraction coupling.Physiological reports · 2020Article
- Device Autonomic Regulation Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of atrial fibrillationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Autonomic dysregulation plays a key role in the development and progression of heart failure (HF). Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) may be a promising therapeutic approach. However, the outcomes from clinical trials evaluating VNS in HF have been mixed, and the mechanisms underlying this treatment remain poorly understood. Intermittent high-frequency VNS (pulse width 300 µs, 30 Hz stimulation, 30 s on, and 300 s off) was used in healthy sheep and sheep in which established HF had been induced by 4 weeks rapid ventricular pacing to assess (a) the effects of VNS on intrinsic cardiac vagal tone, (b) whether VNS delays the progression of established HF, and (c) whether high-frequency VNS affects the regulation of cardiomyocyte calcium handling in health and disease. VNS had no effect on resting heart rate or intrinsic vagal tone in the healthy heart. Although fewer VNS-treated animals showed subjective signs of heart failure at 6 weeks, overall VNS did not slow the progression of clinical or echocardiographic signs of HF. Chronic VNS did not affect left ventricular cardiomyocyte calcium handling in healthy sheep. Rapid ventricular pacing decreased the L-type calcium current and calcium transient amplitude, but chronic VNS did not rescue dysfunctional calcium handling. Overall, high-frequency VNS did not prevent progression of established HF or influence cellular excitation-contraction coupling. However, a different model of HF or selection of different stimulation parameters may have yielded different results. These results highlight the need for greater insight into VNS dosing and parameter selection and a deeper understanding of its physiological effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.