Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31961008›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2020

Utilizing milk from pooling facilities as a novel approach for foot-and-mouth disease surveillance.

Bryony Armson, Antonello Di Nardo, Dickson M Nyaguthii, Beatriz Sanz-Bernardo, Philip M Kitala, Eunice Chepkwony, Valerie Mioulet, Donald P King, Nicholas A Lyons

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bryony ArmsonThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2703-1574
Antonello Di NardoThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.
Dickson M NyaguthiiDepartment of Public Health, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Beatriz Sanz-BernardoThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.
Philip M KitalaDepartment of Public Health, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eunice ChepkwonyFoot-and-Mouth Disease Laboratory, State Department of Livestock, Embakasi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Valerie MiouletThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.
Donald P KingThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.
Nicholas A LyonsThe Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.
The Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Nairobi · KEMinistry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries · KE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 1646343Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E/I/00007004Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007035Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007036Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007037Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs SE1129Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs SE2944European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth DiseaseLawrence Livermore National Laboratory
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of pooled milk as an alternative sample type for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) surveillance. Real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) results of pooled milk samples collected weekly from five pooling facilities in Nakuru County, Kenya, were compared with half-month reports of household-level incidence of FMD. These periodic cross-sectional surveys of smallholder farmers were powered to detect a threshold household-level FMD incidence of 2.5% and collected information on trends in milk production and sales. FMD virus (FMDV) RNA was detected in 9/219 milk samples, and using a type-specific rRT-PCR, serotype SAT 1 was identified in 3/9 of these positive samples, concurrent with confirmed outbreaks in the study area. Four milk samples were FMDV RNA-positive during the half-months when at least one farmer reported FMD; that is, the household-level clinical incidence was above a threshold of 2.5%. Additionally, some milk samples were FMDV RNA-positive when there were no reports of FMD by farmers. These results indicate that the pooled milk surveillance system can detect FMD household-level incidence at a 2.5% threshold when up to 26% of farmers contributed milk to pooling facilities, but perhaps even at lower levels of infection (i.e., below 2.5%), or when conventional disease reporting systems fail. Further studies are required to establish a more precise correlation with estimates of household-level clinical incidence, to fully evaluate the reliability of this approach. However, this pilot study highlights the potential use of this non-invasive, routinely collected, cost-effective surveillance tool, to address some of the existing limitations of traditional surveillance methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksEpidemiological MonitoringFarmersFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusIncidenceKenyaMilkPilot ProjectsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSerogroupendemic systemsfoot-and-mouth diseaseKenyapooled milkrRT-PCRsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31961008
PMCPMC7384003
OpenAlexW3002308172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.