Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31960812›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2020

Efficacy of cattle encephalon glycoside and ignotin in patients with acute cerebral infarction: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.

Hui Zhang, Chuan-Ling Li, Feng Wan, Su-Juan Wang, Xiu-E Wei, Yan-Lei Hao, Hui-Lin Leng, Jia-Min Li, Zhong-Rui Yan, Bao-Jun Wang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of New Nursing on Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Hui ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chuan-Ling LiDepartment of Neurology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Feng WanDepartment of Neurology, Huang Gang Central Hospital, Huanggang, Hubei Province, China.
Su-Juan WangDepartment of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Luoyang City, Luoyang, Henan Province, China.
Xiu-E WeiDepartment of Neurology, General Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yan-Lei HaoDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong Province, China.
Hui-Lin LengDepartment of Neurology, People's Hospital of Yichun City, Yichun, Jiangxi Province, China.
Jia-Min LiDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Shijiazhuang City, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Zhong-Rui YanDepartment of Neurology, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong Province, China.
Bao-Jun WangDepartment of Neurology, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Ren-Shi XuDepartment of Neurology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Ting-Min YuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Li-Chun ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dong-Sheng FanDepartment of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University · CNBaotou Central Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of Shijiazhuang · CNHuanggang Central Hospital · CNJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital · CNJining First People's Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College · CNXuzhou Central Hospital · CNYichun University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle encephalon glycoside and ignotin (CEGI) injection is a compound preparation formed by a combination of muscle extract from healthy rabbits and brain gangliosides from cattle, and it is generally used as a neuroprotectant in the treatment of central and peripheral nerve injuries. However, there is still a need for high-level clinical evidence from large samples to support the use of CEGI. We therefore carried out a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in which we recruited 319 patients with acute cerebral infarction from 16 centers in China from October 2013 to May 2016. The patients were randomized at a 3:1 ratio into CEGI (n = 239; 155 male, 84 female; 61.2 ± 9.2 years old) and placebo (n = 80; 46 male, 34 female; 63.2 ± 8.28 years old) groups. All patients were given standard care once daily for 14 days, including a 200 mg aspirin enteric-coated tablet and 20 mg atorvastatin calcium, both taken orally, and intravenous infusion of 250-500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride containing 40 mg sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate. Based on conventional treatment, patients in the CEGI and placebo groups were given 12 mL CEGI or 12 mL sterile water, respectively, in an intravenous drip of 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride (2 mL/min) once daily for 14 days. According to baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, patients in the two groups were divided into mild and moderate subgroups. Based on the modified Rankin Scale results, the rate of patients with good outcomes in the CEGI group was higher than that in the placebo group, and the rate of disability in the CEGI group was lower than that in the placebo group on day 90 after treatment. In the CEGI group, neurological deficits were decreased on days 14 and 90 after treatment, as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the Barthel Index. Subgroup analysis revealed that CEGI led to more significant improvements in moderate stroke patients. No drug-related adverse events occurred in the CEGI or placebo groups. In conclusion, CEGI may be a safe and effective treatment for acute cerebral infarction patients, especially for moderate stroke patients. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Peking University Third Hospital, China (approval No. 2013-068-2) on May 20, 2013, and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR1800017937).

Indexed as

acute cerebral infarctionBarthel Indexcattle encephalon glycoside and ignotinmodified Rankin ScaleNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scaleneuroprotectantsrecovery ratestroke

Identifiers

PMID31960812
PMCPMC7047806
OpenAlexW3000169042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.