ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2020
Rumination Syndrome: Recognition and Treatment.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and Management Review of Gastric and Supragastric Belching, Aerophagia, and Rumination Syndrome.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026Review
- [Recognition and Management of the Patient with Rumination Syndrome].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe purpose of this paper is to discuss current diagnostic and treatments of rumination. Rumination is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed in adults, especially when symptoms suggest regurgitation rather than vomiting accompanied by re-chewing and re-swallowing and should be included in the differential diagnosis. It is primarily diagnosed clinically by ROME-IV or DSM-5. RECENT
findingsThat rumination can be re-affirmed by characteristic patterns on objective testing such as high-resolution esophageal manometry and 24-h pH impedance testing. However, although gastroduodenal manometry and EMG are helpful, these tests are slowly losing interest given their technical nature of data gathering, time consumption, cost burden, and patient discomfort. SUMMARY: Rumination is primarily diagnosed clinically by ROME-IV or DSM-5 in addition to high-resolution esophageal manometry and 24-h pH impedance. Management is challenging and usually a combination of behavioral, pharmacological, and rarely surgical treatment. Recent data demonstrate that the combination of behavioral techniques such as diaphragmatic breathing exercises and/or with baclofen has promising results. Further research is necessary to further define objective criteria for diagnosis and other therapeutic modalities for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.