Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31960263›Full record

SynthesisJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

Olfactory Dysfunction in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Meta-analytic Review of Autism Spectrum Disorders, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Andrew J D Crow, Jennica M Janssen, Kayci L Vickers, Julia Parish-Morris, Paul J Moberg, David R Roalf

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterizing Olfactory Brain Responses in Young Infants.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. A handbook forFrontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J D CrowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jennica M JanssenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kayci L VickersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Julia Parish-MorrisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Paul J MobergDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David R RoalfDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. roalf@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-9782
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Olfactory and facial markers of developmental risk for psychosis in 22q11 deletion syndromeR01MH119185 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROALF, DAVID R · 2019 to 2024
$3.5M
Neurocognitive variability in schizophrenia and youth at-risk for psychosisK01MH102609 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROALF, DAVID R · 2014 to 2017
$685k
Aberrant Paranasal Sinus Development in SchizophreniaR21MH108895 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOBERG, PAUL J · 2015 to 2016
$440k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH102609NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119185NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH108895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory dysfunction is recognized in neurodevelopmental disorders and may serve as an early indicator of global dysfunction. The present meta-analysis measures olfaction effect sizes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Meta-analysis included 320 ADHD, 346 ASD, and 208 OCD individuals as compared to 910 controls. Olfactory performance deficits were small-to-moderate and heterogeneous (d =  - 0.42, 95% CI =  - 0.59 < δ <  - 0.25). Meta-analytic results indicate that olfactory dysfunction is evident in individuals with ASD and OCD, with small-to-negligible effects in ADHD. These findings imply olfactory dysfunction is related to clinical phenotype in ASD and OCD, but not ADHD, and warrant inclusion in clinical assessment and evaluation of certain neurodevelopmental disorders.

Indexed as

Olfaction DisordersAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutism Spectrum DisorderChildFemaleHumansMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSmellAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderAutism spectrum disordersMeta-analysisObsessive–compulsive disorderOlfaction

Identifiers

PMID31960263
PMCPMC7369237
OpenAlexW3002113657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.