Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31960158›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2020

Pelvic Surgery in the Transplant Recipient: Important Considerations for the Non-transplant Surgeon.

Romain Boissier, Veronique Delaporte, Tristan Legris, Valérie Moal, Eric Lechevallier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Romain BoissierAix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. Romain.Boissier@ap-hm.fr.
Veronique DelaporteDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, La Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Tristan LegrisDepartment of Nephrology, La Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Valérie MoalAix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Eric LechevallierAix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Hôpital de la Conception · FRAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewClassically, kidney transplantation (KT) consists of heterotopic implantation of the renal graft in the iliac fossa with vascular anastomosis on the iliac vessel and reimplantation of the graft ureter in the bladder of the recipient. However, a wide range of variations exist in both vascular anastomosis and urinary diversion that the non-transplant surgeon should know. RECENT

findingsFor any pelvic surgery in a KT patient, the non-transplant surgeon should preoperatively evaluate the anatomy of the graft, its vascularization and its urinary tract. The transplant ureter should be identified and secured by preoperative JJ stenting whenever needed. For any surgery, maintenance and control of both immunosuppressive treatment and renal function is crucial. The advice or even the assistance of a transplant surgeon should be required because any damage to vascularization or urinary drainage of the renal graft could have dramatic and definitive consequences on graft function.

Indexed as

HumansKidney TransplantationPelvisTransplant RecipientsTransplantsUrinary DiversionBenign prostatic hyperplasiaCystectomyImmunosuppressive treatmentKidney transplantProstatectomyUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID31960158
OpenAlexW3002263969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.