Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31960148›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Baby-led weaning: prevalence and associated factors in Spain.

Mónica Pérez-Ríos, Maria Isolina Santiago-Pérez, Haylie Butler, Nerea Mourino, Alberto Malvar, Xurxo Hervada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Adherence to different methods for introducing complementary food to 7-month-old babies: a randomized clinical trial.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mónica Pérez-RíosEpidemiology Unit, Galician Directorate for Public Health. Consellería de Sanidade, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. monica.perez.rios@usc.es.
Maria Isolina Santiago-PérezEpidemiology Unit, Galician Directorate for Public Health. Consellería de Sanidade, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Haylie ButlerDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Nerea MourinoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alberto MalvarEpidemiology Unit, Galician Directorate for Public Health. Consellería de Sanidade, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Xurxo HervadaEpidemiology Unit, Galician Directorate for Public Health. Consellería de Sanidade, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goals of this study are to estimate the percentage of mothers who declared feeding their children with baby-led weaning (BLW) and to characterize them. A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2016 targeting women who had given birth in 2016 (sample size 6777) in Galicia (Spain). The questionnaire included questions regarding the mother's characteristics and behaviors, attitudes, and practices related to BLW. Prevalence of exclusive and non-exclusive BLW was estimated. Different maternal characteristics were evaluated for their possible association with BLW using a logistic regression model. The percentages and ORs were presented with a 95% confidence interval. The study included 6355 women, of which 38.6% (37.4-39.9) had heard of BLW and the overall prevalence of BLW was estimated at 14.0% (13.1-14.9). Prevalence of exclusive BLW was estimated at 2.1% (2.4-3.3). No differences were observed when age was taken into consideration. Children fed with BLW were more likely among mothers who continue with exclusive breastfeeding (OR, 4.1 (95% CI, 3.3-5.0)); live in an urban setting (OR, 1.6 (1.2-2.2)); or have a higher level of education (OR, 1.3 (1.1-1.5)).Conclusion: Full adherence to BLW seems low among mothers who claimed to have fed their children following this method.What is Known:• Baby-led weaning (BLW) has been present in our society for almost two decades, but it remains unclear how many mothers choose BLW for their children.What is New:• BLW is not a common choice for weaning in Spain, and more than half of the mothers had not heard about it.• Full adherence to BLW seems low among mothers who claimed to have fed their children following this method.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant BehaviorMaternal BehaviorWeaningAdolescentAdultBreast FeedingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfantInfant CareLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedBaby-led weaningCross-sectional studyFeeding behaviorFeeding methodsInfantsPrevalence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.