ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2020
Baby-led weaning: prevalence and associated factors in Spain.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adherence to different complementary feeding methods in the first year of life: A randomized clinical trial.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Adherence to different methods for introducing complementary food to 7-month-old babies: a randomized clinical trial.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2022Trial
- Caregivers' Attitudes Toward Baby-Led Weaning: Development and Psychometric Validation of the BLW-CAS.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Household food insecurity and novel complementary feeding methods in New Zealand families.Maternal & child nutrition · 2025Observational
- Professional Feeding Guidance Improved Infants' Self-Feeding Proportion during Complementary Foods Introduction in Beijing, China: An Exploratory Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Are Complementary Feeding Practices Aligned with Current Recommendations? A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Complementary Feeding Methods: Associations with Feeding and Emotional Responsiveness.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Breastfeeding, Complementary Feeding, Physical Activity, Screen Use, and Hours of Sleep in Children under 2 Years during Lockdown by the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chile.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Traditional complementary feeding or BLW (Baby Led Weaning) method? - A cross-sectional study of Polish infants during complementary feeding.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Infant Feeding and Information Sources in Chilean Families Who Reported Baby-Led Weaning as a Complementary Feeding Method.Nutrients · 2021Article
- A quasi-experimental intervention protocol to characterize the factors that influence the acceptance of new foods by infants: mothers' diet and weaning method. Dastatuz project.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Parents' Perception of the Complementary Baby-Led Weaning Feeding Method: A Validation Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main goals of this study are to estimate the percentage of mothers who declared feeding their children with baby-led weaning (BLW) and to characterize them. A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2016 targeting women who had given birth in 2016 (sample size 6777) in Galicia (Spain). The questionnaire included questions regarding the mother's characteristics and behaviors, attitudes, and practices related to BLW. Prevalence of exclusive and non-exclusive BLW was estimated. Different maternal characteristics were evaluated for their possible association with BLW using a logistic regression model. The percentages and ORs were presented with a 95% confidence interval. The study included 6355 women, of which 38.6% (37.4-39.9) had heard of BLW and the overall prevalence of BLW was estimated at 14.0% (13.1-14.9). Prevalence of exclusive BLW was estimated at 2.1% (2.4-3.3). No differences were observed when age was taken into consideration. Children fed with BLW were more likely among mothers who continue with exclusive breastfeeding (OR, 4.1 (95% CI, 3.3-5.0)); live in an urban setting (OR, 1.6 (1.2-2.2)); or have a higher level of education (OR, 1.3 (1.1-1.5)).Conclusion: Full adherence to BLW seems low among mothers who claimed to have fed their children following this method.What is Known:• Baby-led weaning (BLW) has been present in our society for almost two decades, but it remains unclear how many mothers choose BLW for their children.What is New:• BLW is not a common choice for weaning in Spain, and more than half of the mothers had not heard about it.• Full adherence to BLW seems low among mothers who claimed to have fed their children following this method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31960148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.