Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31960144›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Revision surgery for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine: causes, prevention, and treatment strategy.

Pedro Berjano, Riccardo Cecchinato, Alvin Pun, Stefano Boriani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro BerjanoGSpine4, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo CecchinatoGSpine4, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. dott.cecchinato@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-8178
Alvin PunAustin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Stefano BorianiGSpine4, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITAustin Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRevision surgery in spine tumor surgery can offer peculiar challenges given the severity of the majority of these lesions and the complexity of surgical procedures that are required. MATERIALS AND METHODS AND

resultsBased on literature review and on personal experience, surgical site infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, tumor recurrence and hardware failures are some of the possible causes of surgical revision in this set of patients.

conclusionsThe aim of this study is to evaluate the most frequent complications that can lead to revision in spine tumor patients, to provide suggestions on how to prevent these events and to offer reasonable strategies to properly plan and perform a revision surgery. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

ReoperationSpinal NeoplasmsHumansLumbar VertebraePostoperative ComplicationsThoracic VertebraeComplicationsMorbidityRevision surgerySpine surgerySpine tumor

Identifiers

PMID31960144
OpenAlexW3002621612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.