Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31960120›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Meshy business: MRI and ultrasound evaluation of pelvic floor mesh and slings.

Roopa Ram, Kedar Jambhekar, Phyllis Glanc, Ari Steiner, Alison D Sheridan, Hina Arif-Tiwari, Suzanne L Palmer, Gaurav Khatri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Radiological imaging following pelvic prolapse surgery].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Ultrasound in Female Urinary Incontinence.Journal of medical ultrasound
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Roopa RamUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301, W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR, USA. rram@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8536-1221
Kedar JambhekarUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301, W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Phyllis GlancDepartment of Medical Imaging, Body Division, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Rm MG160, Toronto, Canada.
Ari SteinerMount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, USA.
Alison D SheridanDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA.
Hina Arif-TiwariSouth Campus Hospital, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, USA.
Suzanne L PalmerKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Gaurav KhatriDepartment of Radiology, UT South Western Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USSouth Nassau Communities Hospital · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic floor disorders are a complex set of conditions including but not limited to stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse that generally affect older and multiparous women. Of the several surgical options available for treatment of these conditions, synthetic mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence and vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse are amenable to imaging evaluation by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Ultrasound can evaluate the sub- and immediate peri-urethral portions of sling due to its ability to differentiate synthetic material from native tissues with real-time imaging, while MRI is able to better depict the global pelvic floor anatomy and assess the more distant components of mesh and slings material. Given the high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and complications after surgical repair, it is important that radiologists familiarize themselves with normal and abnormal imaging findings after these procedures. This article provides a review of the spectrum of imaging findings in patients after pelvic floor repair with synthetic mid-urethral slings and vaginal mesh.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPelvic FloorSurgical MeshMeshPelvic organ prolapseSlingUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID31960120
OpenAlexW3001628193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.