ReviewRheumatology international2020
Is biological therapy in systemic sclerosis the answer?
Review in Rheumatology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tofacitinib in the treatment of skin and musculoskeletal involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis, evaluated by ultrasound.Rheumatology international · 2021Trial
- Review
- Uncovering the link between inflammatory rheumatic diseases and male reproductive health: a perspective on male infertility and sexual dysfunction.Rheumatology international · 2024Review
- Plasma Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Four Possibly Disrupted Mechanisms in Systemic Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Esophageal Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis: An Update.Rheumatology and therapy · 2021Review
- B cells in systemic sclerosis: from pathophysiology to treatment.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- Rituximab as a Treatment Option after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Patient with Systemic Sclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Parry Romberg disease with En Coup de Sabre Scleroderma: Effect of tocilizumab on periodontal bone inflammation.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2021Article
- Treatment for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2021Review
- Tocilizumab therapy in juvenile systemic sclerosis: a retrospective single centre pilot study.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: Toward Personalized-Medicine-Based Prediction and Drug Screening Models of Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease (SSc-ILD).Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic sclerosis is a systemic fibrosing disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with no universally accepted disease-modifying therapy. Significant advances in the understanding of systemic sclerosis in recent years have guided the exploration of biological drugs in systemic sclerosis. In this narrative review, we summarize the published literature on biologic therapies in systemic sclerosis. A double-blind randomized trial, and an open label trial of tocilizumab (which antagonizes the interleukin 6 receptor), identified potential benefits in skin and lung fibrosis in systemic sclerosis; however, these differences failed to attain statistical significance. Two open-label trials compared rituximab (which depletes B lymphocytes) to conventional treatment/ cyclophosphamide in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), and revealed significant improvements in lung functions and skin disease with rituximab. Significant observational data also support the use of rituximab in skin, lung, muscle and joint manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Abatacept (which blocks T lymphocyte activation) has demonstrated utility for skin and joint disease in systemic sclerosis; a recent clinical trial failed to demonstrate benefits in improving skin thickness compared to placebo. Agents targeting type I interferons, interleukin 17 pathway, CD19 and plasma cells hold promise in systemic sclerosis; however, high-quality evidence is lacking. The results of different ongoing clinical trials targeting B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, various cytokines (interleukins 6, 17, 4, 13, IL-1α), platelet-derived growth factor receptor, proteasome, integrins or oncostatin M may help guide future therapeutic regimens with biological agents in systemic sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.