Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959968›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2020

Klebsiella michiganensis transmission enhances resistance to Enterobacteriaceae gut invasion by nutrition competition.

Rita A Oliveira, Katharine M Ng, Margarida B Correia, Vitor Cabral, Handuo Shi, Justin L Sonnenburg, Kerwyn Casey Huang, Karina B Xavier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The OMMGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Infection strategies ofGut microbes reports · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita A OliveiraInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-5972
Katharine M NgDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Margarida B CorreiaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Vitor CabralInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-3521
Handuo ShiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Justin L SonnenburgDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kerwyn Casey HuangDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8043-8138
Karina B XavierInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal. kxavier@igc.gulbenkian.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5210-1434
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PTChan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) · USStanford University · US

Funding

Impact of Diet on Intestinal Microbiota-Host DynamicsR01DK085025 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JUSTIN L SONNENBURG · 2010 to 2026
$6.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal microbiotas contain beneficial microorganisms that protect against pathogen colonization; treatment with antibiotics disrupts the microbiota and compromises colonization resistance. Here, we determine the impact of exchanging microorganisms between hosts on resilience to the colonization of invaders after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. We assess the functional consequences of dysbiosis using a mouse model of colonization resistance against Escherichia coli. Antibiotics caused stochastic loss of members of the microbiota, but the microbiotas of co-housed mice remained more similar to each other compared with the microbiotas among singly housed animals. Strikingly, co-housed mice maintained colonization resistance after treatment with antibiotics, whereas most singly housed mice were susceptible to E. coli. The ability to retain or share the commensal Klebsiella michiganensis, a member of the Enterobacteriaceae family, was sufficient for colonization resistance after treatment with antibiotics. K. michiganensis generally outcompeted E. coli in vitro, but in vivo administration of galactitol-a nutrient that supports the growth of only E. coli-to bi-colonized gnotobiotic mice abolished the colonization-resistance capacity of K. michiganensis against E. coli, supporting the idea that nutrient competition is the primary interaction mechanism. K. michiganensis also hampered colonization of the pathogen Salmonella, prolonging host survival. Our results address functional consequences of the stochastic effects of microbiota perturbations, whereby microbial transmission through host interactions can facilitate reacquisition of beneficial commensals, minimizing the negative impact of antibiotics.

Indexed as

Microbial InteractionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillotaBacteroidetesCiprofloxacinColony Count, MicrobialDysbiosisEscherichia coliGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGerm-Free LifeKlebsiellaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSalmonella typhimuriumAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinStreptomycin

Identifiers

PMID31959968
OpenAlexW2998757248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.