ArticleScientific reports2020
Seasonal epiphytic microbial dynamics on grapevine leaves under biocontrol and copper fungicide treatments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial terroir in winegrowing: revisiting the role of microbial biogeography in terroir expression.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Review
- Choline pelargonate treatments decreased downy mildew and powdery mildew symptoms with negligible effects on grapevine phyllosphere micro-organisms.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- AJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Fungicide to Phagosome: A One Health View of Copper-Driven Fungal-Bacterial Interactions.Current clinical microbiology reports · 2026Review
- A comparative study: impact of chemical and biological fungicides on soil bacterial communities.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Seasonal Cycles in a Seaweed Holobiont: A Multiyear Time Series Reveals Repetitive Microbial Shifts and Core Taxa.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Fungicide resistance in Fusarium species: exploring environmental impacts and sustainable management strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Metagenomic analysis of the effects of plant- and yeast-based formulations on the grapevine leaf microbiome of cv. 'Touriga Franca'.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Functional diversity of the above-ground fungal community under long-term integrated, organic and biodynamic Vineyard Management.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Arthropods as Vectors of Grapevine Trunk Disease Pathogens: Quantification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Taxonomic analysis reveals host preference of rare fungi in endophytes of Vitis vinifera from the Czech Republic.Folia microbiologica · 2023Article
- Grapevine bacterial communities display compartment-specific dynamics over space and time within the Central Valley of California.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Pruning Wound Protection Products Induce Alterations in the Wood Mycobiome Profile of Grapevines.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Soil and fine root-associated microbial communities are niche dependent and influenced by copper fungicide treatment during tea plant cultivation.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Colonization and population dynamics of total, viable, and culturable cells of two biological control strains applied to apricot, peach, and grapevine crops.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Disentangling the effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The microbiota of the grapevine holobiont: A key component of plant health.Journal of advanced research · 2022Review
- New-Generation Sequencing Technology in Diagnosis of Fungal Plant Pathogens: A Dream Comes True?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A global microbiome survey of vineyard soils highlights the microbial dimension of viticultural terroirs.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Winemakers have long used copper as a conventional fungicide treatment on grapevine and only recently, the use of biocontrol agents depicted a promising alternative. Most of the studies that investigate the impact of fungicide treatments, focus on specific pathogenic microbes. In the present work instead, a field experiment conducted in South Africa shows the seasonal microbial change occurring on grapevine leaves, periodically treated with two different fungicide treatments: copper sulphate and Lactobacillus plantarum MW-1. In this work, NGS data were combined with strain-specific and community qPCRs to reveal the shift of the microbial communities throughout the growing season and highlight the impact of fungicides on the microbiota. Only the family of Lactobacillaceae systematically changed between treatments, while the bacterial community remained relatively stable over time. MW-1 was exclusively detected on biocontrol-sprayed leaves. Conversely, the fungal community was largely shaped by sampling time, underlining the succession of different dominant taxa over the months. Between treatments, only a few fungal taxa appeared to change significantly and the fungal load was also comparable. Monitoring the dynamics of the microbial community under different fungicide treatments may advise the best timing to apply treatments to the plants, toward the realization of more sustainable agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.