Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959752›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Precapillary sphincters maintain perfusion in the cerebral cortex.

Søren Grubb, Changsi Cai, Bjørn O Hald, Lila Khennouf, Reena Prity Murmu, Aske G K Jensen, Jonas Fordsmann, Stefan Zambach, Martin Lauritzen

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pericyte KNature cardiovascular research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A pericyte chloride clamp mechanism governs capillary control of cerebral blood flow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Eppur si muove: the dynamic brain pericyte.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Pericytes in the optic nerve head.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  20. Neurophotonics · 2025
    Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Søren Grubb *Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. sgrubb@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6710-9655
Changsi Cai *Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Bjørn O Hald *Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Lila KhennoufDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6078-7819
Reena Prity MurmuDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Aske G K JensenDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0421-6568
Jonas FordsmannDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-1502
Stefan ZambachDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Martin LauritzenDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. mlauritz@sund.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active nerve cells release vasodilators that increase their energy supply by dilating local blood vessels, a mechanism termed neurovascular coupling and the basis of BOLD functional neuroimaging signals. Here, we reveal a mechanism for cerebral blood flow control, a precapillary sphincter at the transition between the penetrating arteriole and first order capillary, linking blood flow in capillaries to the arteriolar inflow. The sphincters are encircled by contractile mural cells, which are capable of bidirectional control of the length and width of the enclosed vessel segment. The hemodynamic consequence is that precapillary sphincters can generate the largest changes in the cerebrovascular flow resistance of all brain vessel segments, thereby controlling capillary flow while protecting the downstream capillary bed and brain tissue from adverse pressure fluctuations. Cortical spreading depolarization constricts sphincters and causes vascular trapping of blood cells. Thus, precapillary sphincters are bottlenecks for brain capillary blood flow.

Indexed as

AnimalsCapillariesCerebral CortexCerebrovascular CirculationCortical Spreading DepressionFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingImaging, Three-DimensionalIntravital MicroscopyMaleMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonModels, AnimalModels, CardiovascularMuscle Contraction

Identifiers

PMID31959752
PMCPMC6971292
OpenAlexW3000643561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.