Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959714›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2020

Time series evaluation of improvement interventions to reduce alarm notifications in a paediatric hospital.

Colleen M Pater, Tina K Sosa, Jacquelyn Boyer, Rhonda Cable, Melinda Egan, Timothy K Knilans, Amanda C Schondelmeyer, Christine L Schuler, Nicolas L Madsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Colleen M PaterThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA colleen.pater@cchmc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8788-8991
Tina K SosaDivision of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Jacquelyn BoyerFacilities Management, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Rhonda CableStrategic Projects, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Melinda EganInformation Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Timothy K KnilansThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Amanda C SchondelmeyerDivision of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Christine L SchulerDivision of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Nicolas L MadsenThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND10: The Joint Commission identified inpatient alarm reduction as an opportunity to improve patient safety; enhance patient, family and nursing satisfaction; and optimise workflow. We used quality improvement (QI) methods to safely decrease non-actionable alarm notifications to bedside providers.

methodsIn a paediatric tertiary care centre, we convened a multidisciplinary team to address alarm notifications in our acute care cardiology unit. Alarm notification was defined as any alert to bedside providers for each patient-triggered monitor alarm. Our aim was to decrease alarm notifications per monitored bed per day by 60%. Plan-Do-Study-Act testing cycles included updating notification technology, establishing alarm logic and modifying bedside workflow processes, including silencing the volume on all bedside monitors. Our secondary outcome measure was nursing satisfaction. Balancing safety measures included floor to intensive care unit transfers and patient acuity level.

resultsAt baseline, there was an average of 71 initial alarm notifications per monitored bed per day. Over a 3.5-year improvement period (2014-2017), the rate decreased by 68% to 22 initial alarm notifications per monitored bed per day. The proportion of initial to total alarm notifications remained stable, decreasing slightly from 51% to 40%. There was a significant improvement in subjective nursing satisfaction. At baseline, 32% of nurses agreed they were able to respond to alarms appropriately and quickly. Following interventions, agreement increased to 76% (p<0.001). We sustained these improvements over a year without a change in monitored balancing measures.

conclusionWe successfully reduced alarm notifications while preserving patient safety over a 4-year period in a complex paediatric patient population using technological advances and QI methodology. Continued efforts are needed to further optimise monitor use across paediatric hospital units.

Indexed as

Clinical AlarmsHospitals, PediatricChildHumansIntensive Care UnitsMonitoring, PhysiologicPatient Safetyalarm reductionquality improvement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.