Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31959642›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2020

Red and Processed Meats and Health Risks: How Strong Is the Evidence?

Frank Qian, Matthew C Riddle, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Frank B Hu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Processed meat in the diet: general nutritional profile-protein quality and micronutrients.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Frank QianDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Matthew C RiddleDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0003-1169-3036
Judith Wylie-RosettDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-4031-6950
Frank B HuDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA frank.hu@channing.harvard.edu.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Stable Isotope and Metabolomics CoreP60DK020541 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI PESSIN, JEFFREY E. · 1986 to 2014
$29.8M
Translational Research CoreP30DK020541 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI STREAMSON C CHUA · 2015 to 2026
$27.7M
DIETARY PATTERNS AND RISK OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASER01HL060712 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HU, FRANK B, QI, QIBIN · 1998 to 2021
$8.0M
New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research - Translational Intervention Methodology CoreP30DK111022 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI JEFFREY GONZALEZ · 2016 to 2026
$7.8M
Circulating plasma metabolites, diet, and risk of type 2 diabetesR01DK112940 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HU, FRANK B, MORA, SAMIA · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
Dietary Interventions, Metabolites, and Risk of Type 2 DiabetesR01DK102896 · NIDDK · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HU, FRANK B, MARTINEZ GONZALEZ, MIGUEL A. · 2014 to 2017
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL060712NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020541NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111022NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020541NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102896NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK112940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevailing dietary guidelines have widely recommended diets relatively low in red and processed meats and high in minimally processed plant foods for the prevention of chronic diseases. However, an ad hoc research group called the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) consortium recently issued "new dietary guidelines" encouraging individuals to continue their current meat consumption habits due to "low certainty" of the evidence, difficulty of altering meat eaters' habits and preferences, and the lack of need to consider environmental impacts of red meat consumption. These recommendations are not justified, in large part because of the flawed methodologies used to review and grade nutritional evidence. The evidence evaluation was largely based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, which are primarily designed to grade the strength of evidence for clinical interventions especially pharmacotherapy. However, the infeasibility for conducting large, long-term randomized clinical trials on most dietary, lifestyle, and environmental exposures makes the criteria inappropriate in these areas. A separate research group proposed a modified and validated system for rating the meta-evidence on nutritional studies (NutriGRADE) to address several limitations of the GRADE criteria. Applying NutriGRADE, the evidence on the positive association between red and processed meats and type 2 diabetes was rated to be of "high quality," while the evidence on the association between red and processed meats and mortality was rated to be of "moderate quality." Another important limitation is that inadequate attention was paid to what might be replacing red meat, be it plant-based proteins, refined carbohydrates, or other foods. In summary, the red/processed meat recommendations by NutriRECS suffer from important methodological limitations and involve misinterpretations of nutritional evidence. To improve human and planetary health, dietary guidelines should continue to emphasize dietary patterns low in red and processed meats and high in minimally processed plant foods such as fruits and vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and legumes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietEpidemiologic Research DesignFeeding BehaviorFood HandlingFood PreferencesFruitHumansMeatNutsObservational Studies as TopicRed MeatRisk FactorsVegetablesWhole Grains

Identifiers

PMID31959642
PMCPMC6971786
OpenAlexW3001349133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.